Thank God there is no political bias within Harvard. You got me. I’ll just ignore a couple decades of actual events and history and go with that. He’s from Harvard. He’s got to be right.
As he explained, he is not a constitutional originalist, but a Woodrow Wilson “living Constitution” believer. He correctly pointed out that Cruz is not taking an originalist stance on his eligibility to be President. However, he still has to cite authority. You are unable to cite any, I note. As I say, I found him to be susceptible to being influenced by prominent left wing politically powerful operatives, but that was only on his opinion stated to the press. With regard to actual briefing and, for that matter, teaching, he still has to point to authority. You are not able to do that, it appears, because there is not any to support your position that you are aware of or can find.
Ah, but which is correct when two lawyers from Harvard disagree? Answer? They are both right... until a court decides.