To: walford
Please study your history and you will see that Christianity did not really get into the sword method till hundreds of years after its founding. The Reformation brought it back to its original roots.
Islam was always and specifically spread by the sword, except of for their trade legations to Indonesia. And once the religion was ensconced in Indonesia, they began the same pattern we have seen historically.
4 posted on
12/03/2015 11:58:12 PM PST by
wbarmy
(I chose to be a sheepdog once I saw what happens to the sheep.)
To: wbarmy
well, the first and second wave of reformers like Luther (1st) and Calvin/Zwingli (2nd) were not particularly peaceful. It was the Mennonites who were peaceful
The Reformers did fight with a sword.
11 posted on
12/04/2015 12:21:30 AM PST by
Cronos
(Obama�s dislike of Assad is not based on Assad�s brutality but that he isn't a jihadi Mosl)
To: wbarmy
Also, the much maligned Crusades, though poorly executed and not disciplined, they were defensive wars.
30 posted on
12/04/2015 1:34:10 AM PST by
elhombrelibre
(Against Obama. Against Putin. Pro-freedom. Pro-US Constitution. Go Cruz.)
To: wbarmy
Please study your history and you will see that Christianity did not really get into the sword method till hundreds of years after its founding. The Reformation brought it back to its original roots.The differentiating factor between 'sword methods' is that neither Jesus Christ nor His Apostles ever taught that the faith should be spread using the sword and, in fact, taught the exact opposite. Our Lord taught us to love our enemies and to pray for those that would persecute us. Mohammed insisted that his followers take up the sword to impose islam on the world.
56 posted on
12/04/2015 6:02:51 AM PST by
pgkdan
(But as for me and my house, we will serve the Lord.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson