You and others are saying that Islam is fundamentally wrong and cannot be reformed, so what, then? Is the only option to kill all Muslims or convert them to Christianity?
As an outsider, my observation is that the Muslims are much more committed to that approach toward non-believers.
So seriously and realistically, what is your solution to how we deal with Muslims in our homelands?
You assume that I have a solution just because I made the case that Islam cannot be reformed? If Christians want to convert them I’ll leave that to them but it’s not my place to recommend it. I don’t think that would work anyway.
In our homeland Islam should be declared a cult and banned. Since you pointed out that muslims can’t be contained in their homelands in this day and age (and I assume you weren’t recommending that we revert to the technologies and economies of the Middle Ages to keep them away since that’s the only way that would work) we’re going to have to kill them. Here and there.
I don’t think we would have to kill all of them but we should make it absolutely clear that we will if that’s what it takes.
**ABROGATION** is the key Islamic theological concept you must learn to understand why Islamic texts have led to so much violence and probably always will, despite having many peaceful passages.
Abrogation has Islamic scholars consistently view the peaceful, chronologically earlier passages as being overruled by the very violent, later passages.
“So, at first aggressive fighting was forbidden; it later became permissible (2:190) and subsequently obligatory (9:5).[57] This “verse of the sword” abrogated, canceled, and replaced 124 verses that called for tolerance, compassion, and peace.”
http://www.meforum.org/1754/peace-or-jihad-abrogation-in-islam
I talk about the philosophy, not the followers -- the only option is to destroy Islam, the philosophy.