[combat_boots]

“not a database, no vetting process for the ‘immigrants’ coming in”

The government could and should have the means, methods, and knowhow to prevent criminal aliens from committing crimes. If it willingly does not, the citizens have a case at law against the government itself.

The depraved indifference that could apply in any criminal case would apply in civil court-especially where discrimination is demonstrated-against the citizens of the area.

[Art in Idaho]

. . case at law could be brought that makes resettlement a tort against citizens of the area, said tort being the eradication and infringement of civil rights perpetrated by those being brought in as part of the un-amnesty of 0bamanoids and their accomplices in charity and governmental/non-governmental organizations.

The depraved indifference that could apply in any criminal case would apply in civil court-especially where discrimination is demonstrated-against the citizens of the area.

You make some very good points. As a basis to file in court it sounds solid to me. I wonder what Mark Levin would think? Also, Jay Sekulow of ACLJ.org might be interested in litigating this. Any other legal beagles here have any further ideas on this?