You’re the one talking about “droves.” Others are just saying why shouldn’t the GOP candidate reach a wider audience.
Your assertion that doing so—reaching more people than the GOP typically reaches—makes a candidate “Dem lite” is sheer lunacy. Dem lite is going light on the hordes of foreign invaders, enabling Obama’s disastrous TPA deal, and planning to flood the country with low cost foreign workers. It is not simply reaching a wider audience.
No wonder you’re against Trump, if reaching more voters with the GOP message is your definition of Dem lite.
I’m not against Trump.
Without him Jeb would probably be on his way.
Boner wouldn’t be stepping down (if he is still) nor McCarthy be giving up.
Trump’s candidacy has been great.
Not sure where You get the idea I am against Trump.
“You’re the one talking about “droves.””
By the way, I didn’t say anything about droves or use that term.
Perhaps you are mixing up another post with mine.