He’s right. The MSM is having a hissy-fit.
Ask the Germans who tried to dig out the Jews in Warsaw whether the weapons the Jews had made a difference.
This is common sense!
GQ Magazine would, however disagree...
This is why Israel is still around. If they don’t have guns, they won’t exist
When the Germans liquidated the Warsaw ghetto and deported the inhabitants to Treblinka they were met with armed resistance from a few people with firearms. It was quite a struggle to subdue the ghetto even though the Jews had very few weapons. In the end all were killed but it showed that it does not take a lot of weapons to make the evil machinations of tyranny a lot more difficult. So Dr. Carson was correct.
“Carson writes that through a combination of removing guns and disseminating propaganda, the Nazis were able to carry out their evil intentions with relatively little resistance.”
Nazis. National socialists.
Progressives. Liberals. Democrats.
What’s controversial bout this? It’s documented historical fact. The Nazis disarmed the Jews and then proceeded to murder over 6 million of them.
Jerusalem Mayor to Gun Owners: Carry Your Weapons | Daniel Greenfield
http://www.frontpagemag.com/point/260394/jerusalem-mayor-gun-owners-carry-your-weapons-daniel-greenfield
Just as the Umpqua shooting is surely Muslim revenge for the French train take down in Roseburg (Oregon’s “Bible belt” and home town of Skarlatos), surely the stabbing of Stephen Stone by two “asian men” was also Muslim revenge.
Hero who stopped jihad mass murder on French train stabbed repeatedly in California
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2015/10/breaking-news-hero-who-stopped-jihad-mass-murder-on-french-train-stabbed-repeatedly-in-california
by Robert Spencer
“It has not yet been announced whether or not his attacker was a revenge-seeking Muslim who was angry over the prevention of the jihad mass murder attack on the train. More details as they break....”
Going way out on a limb here, I think that’s why the NAZI’s first step was to disarm them.
How can this NOT be true?
The opposing view is what exactly? If only the Jews had tried harder to be nice to the Nazis? If they had more dialogue?
I’m Jewish, and I have studied the Holocaust extensively. It wouldn’t have stopped it, but it would have made a huge difference. At the least, the Germans would have had to devote substantial resources to it, making them lose the war more quickly...which, by itself, would have saved many Jews and others from being murdered.
Of course he is right. That’s why the reaction from the Left is so vociferous - because if you can successfully resist one of the most brutal and oppressive regimes in history with a few hundred thousand or a couple million guns in the hands of a despised minority, what kind of resistance could be put up by 400 million guns in the hands of a large percentage of the population?
Among the many misdeeds of the British rule in India, history will look upon the Act depriving a whole nation of arms as the blackest.
-Gandhi
British disarmed India and able to prolong its rule.
This why the enemy is trying to disarm this nation while the enemy is being poured in here .
(Proverbs 24:21) My son, fear thou the LORD and the king: and meddle not with them that are given to change:
(Proverbs 24:22) For their calamity shall rise suddenly; and who knoweth the ruin of them both?
(Proverbs 24:23) These things also belong to the wise. It is not good to have respect of persons in judgment.
(Proverbs 24:24) He that saith unto the wicked, Thou art righteous; him shall the people curse, nations shall abhor him:
(Proverbs 24:25) But to them that rebuke him shall be delight, and a good blessing shall come upon them.
drew swift condemnation — on CNN
What a bunch of wimpy bastards!
Every synagogue should sponsor a gun club
Duh! Anybody who argues with that statement is incapable of rational thought.
Carson agrees with Solzhenitsyn.