Look at the pics, and decide who you’re going to believe: trustworthy, responsible, unbiased CNN, or your own lying eyes?
How do you know it was really from CNN? Have you found the original CNN link with the photo?
You are obviously missing the point. The fact that someone altered the photo is not in dispute. The fact that CNN WOULD do it is not in dispute. What IS in dispute is whether or not it was CNN. As I pointed out in another post, this would not be the first time someone on the right has made a photoshop of someone and tried to say it was the real deal.
So the question is: IS THERE ANY PROOF THIS WAS CNN?
What about the LA Times article that says the perp was a white-supremacist, but never mentions that he was black? That is just about the same thing CNN is accused of doing.