“I wouldn’t have repeated the “participating stuff” at 476, if you hadn’t used the word “participated” in the first place.”
I have no idea why you do the things you do, and I really have no interest in trying to puzzle it out.
“You said “When police witness you participating in a deadly gang fight, that’s all the probable cause they need.” My rebuttal is that according to the Texas Tenth Court of Appeals, the affidavit in support of arrest does not recite probable cause of participating in a deadly gang fight.”
Well, the 10th Courth of Appeals is not adjudicating this case. The judges who are adjudicating this case don’t agree with you or your interpretation of the Texas penal code and Texas judical decisions. Apparently, you fancy yourself more of an expert on those matters than sitting judges in Texas, but I don’t.
Unless you have an odd definition of "this case," the blockquote I gave is from the biker shooting incident at Twin Peaks in Waco, Texas on May 17, 2015. Texas Tenth Court of Appeals Case numbers given to you in an earlier post.
I don't mind being insulted, but you beclown yourself when your insults flow from your own ignorance. Not that there is anything wrong with being ignorant, we all have blind spots.