I don’t disagree with most of your premises, but I cannot agree to some sort of outside the bounds of the law solution to unlawful acts by the SCOTUS.
A Constitutional way has to be found to counter the skulduggery.
I don’t agree with the court here. I do understand why things are like they are though.
Exactly. I HATE the gay agenda, but for now, we're stuck with homo marriage. No amount of protesting, foot stomping or flailing will change that.
The only way around it seems to be a constitutional amendment. For now at least, the opt-out avenue is what we have to deal with, until homo marriage destroys itself or becomes marginalized despite the law.
Why? Do they abide in it? No! Both DEM and GOP elected wipe their arse with it. Disobedience has been done as a means of correction and done so successfully. In my county a group of men sent the state militia packing but not before capturing their commander. That was over the governor of the era sending in inmates to coal mines thus endangering everyone's life. Look it up the Coal Creek War.
The revolt saved the inmates very lives as history would show within a decade when two of the worse mine explosions in history would occur in that very community one killing all the men in the town.
Another one was more recent and took place about 100 miles south of there. A group of WW2 vets came home and basically found their county government under siege by a very small highly corrupt and abusive oligarchy. Look up the Battle of Athens, Tennessee. It lasted a matter of hours.
I think Tennessee may have even had a Marine who upon discharge from service & moving back to his hometown saw corruption and almost literally had a one man war with the county government including it's sheriff & judges and he won it. Yes he used force. He carried a big stick.
Things are the way they are because our government has lost all fear and all respect for The Constitution of The United States & We The People thus declaring themselves "We The Overlords of the Untouchables" and have abandoned the Constitution of The United States which sets forth the powers as well as the "LIMITATIONS" of the federal government. Specifically Article X
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
The government of the United States was never intended to become our authoritarian overlord nor used as a means for corrupt leaders to subvert it and in doing so overthrow our Constitutional Republic as we are seeing today.
IOW they themselves no longer respect political process nor the Constitution because as such they are now a sole party united simply by the lust of power. They do not care if we say Pretty Please Don't Do That it's against the Constitution for you to force citizens into such acts against conscience before GOD such as the enforcement of making baking Homosexuals a cake and marrying them the law of the land. Thus today we see business owners being fined by unelected Commissioners for obedience to their conscience. When government becomes that destructive it is not called the law at that point. No Indeed our founding fathers called it "Tyranny" and laws of the day be damned they didn't put up with it nor should we.