When a case comes down like Roe Vs Wade, the issue is considered settled. I realize it isn’t to those who disagree and wish to defend the innocent, and I sympathize with that view. It’s very frustrating.
On the other hand, as other cases come up, the courts look at other SCOTUS decisions and ultimately consider the issue already settled.
A claimant raises an issue. The court responds that this is a settled matter. Unless it is presented in a way that a wedge issue is deemed arguably different, it won’t move on.
Someone in Arizona making the same argument that appeared in Roe Vs Wade, is going to be given the same answer at a lower court level.
I do think the 14th is a problem. Interpretation becomes problematic.
Perhaps the 14th Amendment reveals the fallibility of man compared to God better than any other example.
Yeah....well.....when faced with all these legal stunts, My laymen’s response is generally to hang all the lawyers..:-)
It’s been said in many ways and many times before.