Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Duchess47
I agree with your comments, and I don't see this being corrected easily.

Some folks here have raised some interesting points.

I particularly liked the concept SergeantDave came up with here. LINK

It seems to me this would be a great tactic to exploit for Davis attorney.

100 posted on 09/05/2015 12:59:11 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (It's beginning to look like "Morning in America" again. Comment on YouTube under Trump Free Ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]


To: DoughtyOne; Uncle Sham; sergeantdave

I wish I knew and/or remembered more of my classes. I have to bow out to those who have more legal knowledge on this.

I have always believed that the Supreme Court ruled on lower courts based on actual law and on the constitutionality of said law. And that the way to change a law was to challenge it at the Supreme Court or ammend the Constitution regarding that particular law.

I do remember reading in Trump’s 2000 book “The America We Deserve” that he thought there should be term limits on the Justices. It was a library book and returned so I can’t reference the page or the exact quote, I thought when reading it what a great idea it was.


108 posted on 09/05/2015 1:22:50 PM PDT by Duchess47 ("One day I will leave this world and dream myself to Reality" Crazy Horse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson