Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Waco Biker Massacre: Inconclusive Autopsy Reports, Absurd Court Decisions, Gag Order Maintained
Reason ^ | August 28, 2015 | Brian Doherty

Posted on 08/31/2015 4:10:15 AM PDT by don-o

I’ve reported at length before about various reasons to question the official government narrative surrounding the chaotic and violent incident that resulted in nine people shot to death and 18 wounded and 177 arrested outside the Twin Peaks restaurant in Waco, Texas, on May 17.

It all happened outside a planned meeting of a mostly political biker club coalition, the Confederation of Clubs and Independents. See here for the most recent, and here the most thorough, of that reporting.

The gag order on people involved in defending the arrested, keeping information from flowing to the public on this controversy, was successfully challenged, then alas reinstated earlier this month.

A set of autopsy reports have been issued about the dead. They are available in full at the Waco Tribune.

The Aging Rebel website, which has featured a lot of interesting reporting and speculation casting doubt on the police story, sums up the somewhat vague basics in this post.

While they do not authoritatively state any judgment on to exactly what type of bullets from what type of gun did the killings—important to discover how many of the deaths and woundings were caused by police themselves as opposed to out of control feuding bikers—the Aging Rebel web site sums up what they don’t tell us:

They do not….disprove the notion that all, or at least most of the dead men were killed by police using M-16s and FN P90 machine guns.

Thirteen of sixteen entrance wounds were .25 inches in diameter or smaller.

FN P90s fire a round with a diameter of .224409 inches. M-16s fire slightly smaller rounds with diameters of 0.218898 inches. All but one of the victims had wounds fired from a downward trajectory. Six of the nine dead had head or neck wounds. None of the wounds contained gunshot residue which indicates that the shots were fired from at least three feet away and probably five feet or farther away. The absence of residue casts doubt on claims by prosecutors of “Bandidos executing Cossacks, and Cossacks executing Bandidos.” Two of the dead had large wounds consistent with a 12 gauge shotgun slug. Ten of 16 wounds were in the back, indicating that the victims were running away when they died. Seven of the wounds were fired from right to left. Six were fired from left to right.

Nine millimeter bullets have a diameter of 0.35433 inches; forty caliber handguns fire a bullet that is four tenths of an inch in diameter and 357 magnums fire rounds that are about .357 inches in diameter…

Most of the recovered bullets were either highly deformed or fragmented which indicates they were fired by high velocity …..

Most police ammunition in the United States is designed to penetrate a human body to a depth of 12 inches and for that reason that ammunition is usually copper jacketed. Most of the bullets that killed at the Twin Peaks were copper jacketed….

None of the autopsies include ballistics information. Notations by eight pathologists involved in the autopsies describe bullets and bullet fragments in very general and inconsistent terms….

In other Waco news, the “examining trial” hearings have been happening for various of the arrested. Those proceedings are meant to ascertain whether there was sufficient cause for an arrest in the first place such that the arrested’s cases should go to a grand jury for actual indictment. The results have not been encouraging about the judicial system's attitudes toward this whole mess.

A 65-year-old Bandido (one of the two biker gangs most blamed by police for the chaos) chaplain, Lawrence Yager, was found justifiably arrested, mostly because he had (legally owned and carried) guns in his possession and in his truck, although, as the Waco Tribune reported:

Yager’s attorney, Landon Northcutt, of Stephenville, argued after the testimonies of Department of Public Safety Lt. Steven Schwartz and Waco police Detective Sam Key that neither officer could offer evidence that Yager conspired to commit murder, assault or any crime that day.

Yager was not wearing his cuts or colors that day and serves as chaplain for the Bandidos, a VFW post and the Texas Association of Vietnam Vets, Northcutt said.

“He was wearing a Christian T-shirt. He was there to minister to people who need him. That is what he does. He is retired. That is all he does,” Northcutt told the judge.

The Waco Tribune’s reporting from the examining trial (where standards for keeping the defendant in the system are far lower than probable cause) of married couple William and Morgan English is a good window into the standards that went into many, likely most, of the arrests that day:

Department of Public Safety Lt. Steven Schwartz, a 17-year department veteran, testified at the morning hearing that William and Morgan English wore patches that identified them as members of a group called Distorted….

He said he thinks the Englishes were aware of the rift between the Cossacks and Bandidos and they were there that day as a show of support for the Bandidos.

But under cross-examination from [the Englishes' lawyer Paul] Looney, Schwartz said neither he nor other DPS investigators were aware that the seven-member Distorted group existed before May 17…

Schwartz said they wore patches that said they support the Bandidos, so that tells him they are at least “somewhat involved in criminal activity.”

He said he saw nothing that day and has developed no subsequent evidence to show the Englishes are involved in criminal activity…..

Schwartz agreed with Looney that the Englishes were cooperative and agreed to talk to investigators after the shooting.

“He said they told police that one of their friends brought a gun with him, but they left it locked up in the car.

“Other than that, all we have is that they were merely present at a murder. Correct?” Looney asked.

“Correct,” Schwartz said.

Only two of the 177 bikers who were arrested on engaging in organized criminal activity charges remain jailed in McLennan County.

Texas Lawyer magazine sums up the grand jury process at work in this case, which won’t see any of the arrested having any chance to clear their names until October, five months after the arrest.

Former Reason intern Jeff Winkler, writing in Texas Monthly, reports on various biker theories as to what was really up at Twin Peaks that day, reported from a planned rally in support of the arrested bikers that was shut down by a bomb scare last week.

Winkler's story ends with a touching scene of various bikers visiting the scene of the crime, treating it like an eerie combination of war memorial and live crime investigation, speculating on what sort of bullets from whom could have taken down biker comrades. (Many are quite sure a sniper was on the roof of a nearby restaurant shooting into the crowd.)

And two non-biker patrons on the scene are suing the restaurant for damages, claiming they were emotionally traumatized and received cuts and bruises at the scene, and that Twin Peaks was negligent for allowing the biker meeting to occur there in the first place after receiving warnings from police not to do so.

I talked briefly on the phone today with lawyer Clint Broden, who represents three of the people arrested that day. Besides confirming the history of the gag order being overturned then reimposed, when asked for any opinions about the relevance of, say, the inconclusive autopsy report, this lawyer representing clients in a matter of intense public interest involving possible criminal malfeasance by police could only beg off.

He’s under a gag order.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: waco; wacobikers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 181-188 next last
To: AMDG&BVMH

“Why did they explode Abraham Lincoln’s head in the video?”

I think maybe he was trying to outdo Teasdale in the graphics department.


81 posted on 09/01/2015 11:18:52 AM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: USNBandit

“He’s not a boot licker. He just hates Bandidos. I lived in a town with Bandidos. I hate them too. Not because I hate bikers, but I am less than tolerant with people that specialize in dealing drugs to teenagers and statutory rape. “

You nailed it. I keep trying to separate the good bikers from the gangsters but some here won’t stand for that.

Before this, I would never have imagined the support that the gangsters would get on FR.


82 posted on 09/01/2015 11:21:43 AM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator
“Positive Christianity” is dead.

Okay, use these guys.

You were expressing concern with PRESENT church goers, particularly female church goers ..

Yes, I am very concerned. They do not ride on the back of motorcycles enough, and since...

a) beauty is good;

b) long legs under blown-up skirts are beautiful;

c) anticipated post-ride plundering is arousing;

d) such arousal is infuriating to the impotent tyrant;

e) more beauty should be brought into the world.




83 posted on 09/01/2015 11:25:10 AM PDT by Robert Teesdale (III% | 4GW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Robert Teesdale
"I do not approve that message!



Well, your mileage may vary.
84 posted on 09/01/2015 11:26:14 AM PDT by Robert Teesdale (III% | 4GW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator
I think maybe he was trying to outdo Teasdale in the graphics department.

Teesdale, if you will, although spelling has varied over the last half millenia.
85 posted on 09/01/2015 11:27:49 AM PDT by Robert Teesdale (III% | 4GW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator; USNBandit
I hate them too. Not because I hate bikers, but I am less than tolerant with people that specialize in dealing drugs to teenagers and statutory rape.

and

You nailed it. I keep trying to separate the good bikers from the gangsters but some here won’t stand for that.

Well, that's really the crux of it here.

Your definition of criminal includes those who bear membership marks in parallel with those who, bearing the same mark, may individually be guilty of unlawful conduct.

That is a brush too broad for many here to accept without it being forced upon them by lethal State force. Which, of course, is exactly what happened in Waco. And which is, of course, also exactly what enrages and mobilizes so many Americans in disgust at the latest talon-score of the Leviathan.

“In contrast to commercial trademarks, which are used in commerce and generally not entitled to full First Amendment protections, collective membership marks are used by members of an organization to ‘indicate membership in a union, an association, or other organization.’ The use and display of collective membership marks therefore directly implicate the First Amendment’s right to freedom of association. The Supreme Court has recognized that ‘implicit in the right to engage in activities protected by the First Amendment’ is ‘a corresponding right to associate with others in pursuit of a wide variety of political, social, economic, educational, religious, and cultural ends.’ This right is crucial in preventing the majority from imposing its views on groups that would rather express other, perhaps unpopular, ideas.’ Furthermore, clothing identifying one’s association with an organization is generally considered expressive conduct entitled to First Amendment protection.”(Judge Cooper, 2009 ruling)

Therefore, what you espouse and advocate is abusive and unconscionable tyranny, whether aimed at the Fat Mexican, Opus Dei or your local knitting circle. It is unacceptable, and I (like many others) do not accept and will not tolerate it.

Before this, I would never have imagined the support that the gangsters would get on FR.

You mistake the defense of freedom against your diffidence to human rights, with reductio ad absurdum support for gangsters.

No sale.

And no cigar.
86 posted on 09/01/2015 11:41:37 AM PDT by Robert Teesdale (III% | 4GW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Robert Teesdale

“Okay, use these guys.”

That is not a church, it is a government organization.


87 posted on 09/01/2015 11:43:38 AM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Robert Teesdale

“Your definition of criminal includes those who bear membership marks in parallel with those who, bearing the same mark, may individually be guilty of unlawful conduct.”

My definition of ‘criminal’ is those that commit crimes.


88 posted on 09/01/2015 11:46:25 AM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator
That is not a church, it is a government organization.

That's okay, you and everyone else here is bright enough to understand my point.
89 posted on 09/01/2015 11:46:35 AM PDT by Robert Teesdale (III% | 4GW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator
My definition of ‘criminal’ is those that commit crimes.

Then by your definition, the bearing of supportive membership marks or even full patch status in a 1%er MC such as the Bandidos does not constitute a criminal act.

Agreed?
90 posted on 09/01/2015 11:48:23 AM PDT by Robert Teesdale (III% | 4GW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Robert Teesdale

“Therefore, what you espouse and advocate is abusive and unconscionable tyranny, whether aimed at the Fat Mexican, Opus Dei or your local knitting circle. It is unacceptable, and I (like many others) do not accept and will not tolerate it.”

LOL! Cite your evidence that that is what I advocate! Your brush has been dipped in BS.


91 posted on 09/01/2015 11:48:32 AM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: USNBandit

“Just something to think about since they didn’t say they were getting shot at by police.”

One biker said that when the shooting started, he took cover behind the cars on the Don Carlos side. Obviously he was ducking from biker shooting, not the police shooting.

The police say they have videos. They will be revealed at some point.

It would be nice if we could all get along until some real information comes out.


92 posted on 09/01/2015 11:51:59 AM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Robert Teesdale

“Then by your definition, the bearing of supportive membership marks or even full patch status in a 1%er MC such as the Bandidos does not constitute a criminal act. Agreed?”

Agreed to a point. I do not have full details of what is required of a prospect to become full patched. If he is not required to perform criminal acts then he may not be a criminal.

However, several biker sites say that for some MC’s the prospect must commit a felony to prove himself.


93 posted on 09/01/2015 11:58:44 AM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator
LOL! Cite your evidence that that is what I advocate! Your brush has been dipped in BS.

Sure.

111 of 209 I have only equated biker gangs with criminals.

43 of 49 Why would anyone put on a patch identifying themselves as part of a criminal gang ... unless they were part of the criminal gang.

Not going to dig further, everyone here is bright enough to understand my point here too.


94 posted on 09/01/2015 11:59:11 AM PDT by Robert Teesdale (III% | 4GW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator
Agreed to a point. I do not have full details of what is required of a prospect to become full patched. If he is not required to perform criminal acts then he may not be a criminal.

Then we are in agreement. Let us pursue such efforts of confluence:

However, several biker sites say that for some MC’s the prospect must commit a felony to prove himself.

That is hearsay. If you have been "a biker since 1961" as you assert (and not merely a rider of motorcycles) then you would also know that the exact requirements of any prospect in a traditional three piece patch club (1%er or not) would be considered club business and therefore, the opinion or statement of an outsider would not be reliable in that regard.

It is a fatuous claim to assert the prospecting requirements of any club without being a patch holder, and an inexcuseable revelation of club business as a patch holder.


95 posted on 09/01/2015 12:02:49 PM PDT by Robert Teesdale (III% | 4GW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Robert Teesdale

“Not going to dig further, everyone here is bright enough to understand my point here too.”

Your point was to state one thing and then respond with unrelated evidence ...


96 posted on 09/01/2015 12:04:08 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Robert Teesdale

“That is hearsay.”

So what. Not the point of my answer. I gave two scenarios.

I said if they commit a felony they are criminals.

I said if they do not they can not be considered criminals.

Black and white.


97 posted on 09/01/2015 12:06:45 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator
I infer that you are religiously observant and that your faith is important to you, not only on a personal basis but as a foundational part of our social fabric. I make this observation with respect.

Soldiers for Jesus

What is your opinion of this three piece patch club, either beforehand or following review of the link above?

I am seeking only a cursory opinion, not an in-depth analysis or provable judgment.
98 posted on 09/01/2015 12:06:46 PM PDT by Robert Teesdale (III% | 4GW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator
I said if they commit a felony they are criminals.

Yes, you did. And I take that, to mean individuals that commit a felony, are criminals individually.

I said if they do not they can not be considered criminals.

Agreed.

I further state that the commission of a felony by one individual, does not create a penumbra of criminality to all those bearing identical membership marks. Even in the case of a RICO adjudication of any particular group, said RICO adjudication is based on elaborated individual participation in specifically charged crimes, not to bearing of membership marks or non-criminal association as part of that group membership.

The patch does not make the criminal, nor the criminal condemn the patch.

Black and white.

Hard slogging to get here, no?
99 posted on 09/01/2015 12:11:48 PM PDT by Robert Teesdale (III% | 4GW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

Of course....because everyone knows cops don’t use 9mm. Or .40.


100 posted on 09/01/2015 12:18:46 PM PDT by saleman (?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 181-188 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson