You are most certainly correct.
NO true scientist would even come close to climate change.
Why?
1. Inability to analyze data...and generate appropriate error bars.
2. Principal Component analysis? Waz dat?
3. Never let data get in the way of a conclusion.
4. Analysis of how far IR absorbtion got 100 years ago vs today? Nah?
5. Computer models that actually predicted anything? Negativo.
6. Revealed emails showing complicity with item 3? Yup
7. Where’s that “ice free” Arctic, Obamahole?
8. And oh yeah, there’s the record setting ice in the Antartic.
Want more?
Lots more, but first, you might try getting a passing grade in “Physics for Poets” and then we can get on to some real science.
Bring it, oh liberal mathphobe.
http://iowahawk.typepad.com/iowahawk/2009/12/fables-of-the-reconstruction.html
Nice touch on IR absorption. Not to mention, what was the global temperature and ppm of CO2 in the Jurassic?
Oh, really? Without SUVs...oh. The dinosaurs knew they would *become* fossil fuels and preemptively warmed the atmosphere millions of years in advance.
There have been dinosaur fossils found in what is now Alaska (Pachycephalosaurs, I thought it was). How did we get glaciation? What happened to runaway feedback?