Spurt X says: I also take issue with anyone who rides dressed up to look like Hell’s Angels, with the obvious purpose to intimidate non-clubbers and law abiding citizens, by inference.
In other words, X-spurt doesn't think Americans have the right of free association with people he disapproves of, or the right to ride motorcycles where they please wearing what they please (short of impersonating a police officer), while otherwise engaging in perfectly lawful, peaceful activities, such as attending a pre-scheduled, pre-announced, established COCI meeting in a public restaurant.
It is ridicules [sic] and subversive to try to excuse the participants at Twin Peaks ...
WRONG. It is subversive and anti-American to try to excuse "law enforcement" destruction of the lives of probably 150 totally innocent Americans -- TWO THIRDS of those arrested and incarcerated for at least two weeks and originally held on million dollar bail, had ZERO prior records of criminality or even arrests. ZIP.
But they ALL have records now, with very serious charges, they ALL have had to pay many thousands of dollars if not more to reclaim their normal lives -- in short, they ALL were harshly and severely punished without due process. And TWO THIRDS OF THEM had never even been arrested before.
X-spurt and other trolls here DEFEND that betrayal of our Founding Fathers. They DEFEND that Civil Servants enjoy very different rights than the citizens/civilians they ostensibly serve. X-spurt and trolls think that civil servants deserve the right to punish first and if they were breaking the law, only be held accountable years later; would that we civilians and citizens could punish abusive Civil Servants first and only be held to account years later!
But be assured -- that is EXACTLY ESSIENTALLY what X-spurt and other trolls here are advocating -- a situation where the courts can no longer protect citizens/civilians from the abuse of Civil Servants.
Thankfully, such trolls are less than ONE THIRD on these threads, though their volume of posts falsely inflates their representation, like a puff adder snake puffing up to look not so small to threats). In real numbers, smarter/more honest MORE THAN DOUBLE the numbers of the trolls among FReepers who have expressed an opinion on Waco one way or the other. TWO THIRDS of us think the cops' narrative stinks of cover-up and bad intent.
X-Spurt lies when he claims to be "correcting misinformation." He is defending government tyranny. IF those Waco cops were so well informed and so "prepared for any eventuality," then why in hell didn't they arrest the small handful of actual troublemakers and PERCEIVE THE OBVIOUS REALITY that most of the people they mistook for "thugs" were were average peaceful legal bikers?
The cops were either the stupidest, most obtuse pinhead heavily-armed freaks on the planet -- or they were the most mal-intentioned with regard to the American Constitution.
By definition, X-Spurt clearly thinks they were the first, although he won't acknowledge it.
“such as attending a pre-scheduled, pre-announced, established COCI meeting in a public restaurant.”
Why was the meeting shifted from Austin to Waco at the last minute and the word put out to the gang members to come in from all over the state?
” COCI meeting in a public restaurant”
The Texas Confederation of Clubs and Independents is a Bandidos run extortion scheme.
“In other words, X-spurt doesn’t think Americans have the right of free association with people he disapproves of, or the right to ride motorcycles where they please wearing what they please (short of impersonating a police officer), while otherwise engaging in perfectly lawful, peaceful activities, such as attending a pre-scheduled, pre-announced, established COCI meeting in a public restaurant.”
I think he draws the line when the warring gangs draw their guns at a public restaurant ....
The axiom of “toss a stone over the fence and the dog hit is the one that barks”. Are you a member of one of these ‘clubs’ you so try to cover up for?
Seriously, I am interested in learning what you all’s seemingly strong connection could.
Which motorcycle ‘club’?
Thanks Finny, I also responded to x-spurt’s ridiculous assumptions, and left it at agree to disagree. Hopefully that ends his fear that I am damaging FR with my argument, which I will never capitulate on.
This case stinks from the head.