Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: SamAdams76
As a chemist, I just fail to see how burning fuel to power a generator to generate electricity to charge a battery to run an electric motor to propel a vehicle can possibly be more efficient than burning fuel to directly power a motor that propels a vehicle.

It's called "thermodynamics." Ever hear of it?

30 posted on 06/23/2015 6:54:49 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("One man with a gun can control a hundred without one." -- Vladimir Lenin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: E. Pluribus Unum
Dear Mr. "I'm a chemist" with the condescending attitude:

People smarter than you or I are investing billions in alternative sources of energy. You seem to have taken the "settled science" approach in that gas-powered internal combustion engines are as good as it's ever going to get with respect to automobiles.

However, I'm thinking the real issue here is that you have accepted the narrative that anybody talking about "electric cars" is pushing some kind of Leftist liberal agenda.

You seem to associate electric cars with smug yuppies from San Francisco who wear goatees and sip on $7 lattes while tooling around the Bay Area in their Teslas and Priuses with a superior attitude about them. You would rather put the brakes on this technological progress in order to "wipe the smug smiles" off their faces.

You are taking this WAY too personal.

What I'm saying is to stop ceding progress to liberals. Conservatives should be championing new technologies and progress, not fighting against it because they perceive liberals as "getting a victory".

Let's get involved and claim the victory for ourselves.

Granted an internal combustion engine still kicks butt. But that does not mean we should stop trying to develop something that could turn out to be even better. Even if today, it's not better.

Imagine if the world gave up on aviation because they thought that that ugly noisy contraption built by the Wright Brothers that barely got 20 feet off the ground at Kitty Hawk was not as efficient as hot air balloons for getting up into the air.

32 posted on 06/23/2015 7:32:14 PM PDT by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson