Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
To: thomasryan
Placing additional burdens on the exercise of a right is the definition of infringement.
2 posted on
05/30/2015 1:53:33 PM PDT by
pgyanke
(Republicans get in trouble when not living up to their principles. Democrats... when they do.)
To: thomasryan
It’s NY, why the hell not.
3 posted on
05/30/2015 1:54:06 PM PDT by
MaxMax
(Call the local GOP and ask how you can support CRUZ for POTUS, Make them talk!)
To: thomasryan
Oh, yeah. The criminals are going to rush to buy this.
4 posted on
05/30/2015 1:54:23 PM PDT by
Jim Robinson
(Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
To: thomasryan
Unconstitutional. This commie bitch needs to be thrown in prison where she belongs.
6 posted on
05/30/2015 1:56:40 PM PDT by
FlingWingFlyer
(Without God there would be no science.)
To: thomasryan
As long as we’re at it, we should require everyone to have “Thug Insurance”... just in case we decide to engage in government-approved, violent demonstrations.
7 posted on
05/30/2015 1:57:02 PM PDT by
pgyanke
(Republicans get in trouble when not living up to their principles. Democrats... when they do.)
To: thomasryan
This will be just like Obamacare.
Mandatory Insurance + Stratospheric Deductible = Profit!!!
8 posted on
05/30/2015 1:57:30 PM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Islamophobia. A word created by fascists and used by cowards to manipulate morons. -- Andrew Cummins)
To: thomasryan
The irony is that this chick wouldn’t even be IN congress if isn’t wasn’t for guns.....
9 posted on
05/30/2015 1:57:31 PM PDT by
wny
To: thomasryan
in·fringe inˈfrinj
verb act so as to limit or undermine (something); encroach on. "his legal rights were being infringed"
synonyms: restrict, limit, curb, check, encroach on; More
10 posted on
05/30/2015 1:57:31 PM PDT by
skeeter
To: thomasryan
Hey lady, remember the 2nd Amendment?
Those rights shall not be infringed upon. Most guns are owned by law-abiding citizens exercising their rights under the Constitution. They don't need liability insurance anymore than Congress Critters need a pay raise.
Why not require criminals to have liability insurance and fine them if they don't? They're the ones that cause all the problems with guns. Leave the rest of us alone and do something productive and constructive with your time in the Congress besides trying to make it harder for citizens to own guns.
11 posted on
05/30/2015 1:57:54 PM PDT by
HotHunt
To: thomasryan
What about the thugs?
Will they be fined $10,000 if they have an unlicensed firearm?
12 posted on
05/30/2015 1:59:35 PM PDT by
ladyjane
To: thomasryan
Should this pass - which it won’t - then every licensed & insured gun owner should automatically have “open carry” rights nationwide, regardless of state law.
To: thomasryan
One of the benefits of NRA membership is insurance. This bill could swell the membership of the NRA to ten times its current size.
Interesting.
To: thomasryan
If you have a homeowner or a renter policy you already have liability insurance.
17 posted on
05/30/2015 2:01:11 PM PDT by
ealgeone
To: thomasryan
Sounds like an infringement.
To: thomasryan
Hmmmm, what other God given rights do I need to insure?
20 posted on
05/30/2015 2:03:23 PM PDT by
Las Vegas Ron
("Medicine is the keystone in the arch of socialism" Vladimir Lenin)
To: thomasryan
This is an assault on the elderly and poor minorities who cannot afford this “insurance” ( extortion). The elderly would have to chose between grub and medicine or self defense while the hardworking, hardworking poor will have to chose between food, rent and school clothes or self defense. Throw this Nazi ho in prison.
22 posted on
05/30/2015 2:06:26 PM PDT by
FlingWingFlyer
(Without God there would be no science.)
To: thomasryan
Maloney said in a statement:
“We require insurance to own a car, but no such requirement exists for guns,
The results are clear, car fatalities have declined by 25 percent in the last decade,
but gun fatalities continue to rise.”
-
And no one bothered to ask how having liability insurance
on our cars relates to having fewer car fatalities?
23 posted on
05/30/2015 2:07:41 PM PDT by
Repeal The 17th
("We The People" have met the enemy; and it is "We The People".)
To: thomasryan
Any bets on whether they would then make it impossible to get that insurance?
25 posted on
05/30/2015 2:11:19 PM PDT by
KarlInOhio
(The 1st amendment is the voice and the 2nd is the teeth of freedom. Obama wants to knock out both.)
To: thomasryan
Amend it to require slander and libel insurance for speech. It would become illegal to speak or write in any way without buying insurance first.
To: thomasryan
I notice since Fergueson, MO the gun control crowd has been a lot quieter on the “only police should have guns” angle.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson