The flavor of your messages indicate this issue lives in your head. Your efforts to shift blame to the confederate boogiemen imply that you do have some sort of deep seated guilt.
As Shakespear said, "The lady doth protest too much, methinks."
I back the rule of law against petulant fools who put us all at risk in order to defend the absolutely indefensible - slavery.
Now right here is where you are deliberately lying. You are once more implying that the Union fought the war to end slavery. No they didn't. They were not going to end slavery, they were going to let it continue just as before. You are once more trying the old "bait and switch", because if you can't keep the argument on slavery, you got nothing. They only abolished it out of revenge, not because it was the right thing to do.
I stand on the side of the winners and it is you who whines about the losers.
Your moral hatred should focus on those people who knew it was evil, and yet planned to allow it to continue. Who's only concern was keeping the yoke of Washington D.C. on people who didn't want it, and who would allow the continuation of slavery so long as the southern states accepted rule from Washington.
Sometimes the bad guys win. Notice who is running FedZilla nowadays? :)
Your Liberal Projection™ is just (exactly) like a leftist. My interest in or participation on a WBTS thread equals obsession or, even more absurdly, "deep seated guilt" in your twisted view of the world. Yet your participation and endless apologetics for the indefensible isn't?
Sometimes the bad guys win. Notice who is running FedZilla nowadays?
A complete and utter non sequitur on your part. The "good guys" did win. And their winning had zero to do with "fedzilla".