Cheyene Mt. Complex Posted on 04/19/2015 10:57:56 AM PDT by DanMiller
Some consider North Korea to be the rogue nation most likely to use an electromagnetic pulse (EMP) to attack America; Iran is also seen as quite likely to do it. It matters little which succeeds.
Here is a lengthy 2013 video about an EMP attack, what would happen and why:
[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q9z4EnE9baU]
The possibilities and consequences of an EMP attack on America are too horrific to contemplate; the "legitimate news media" generally ignore them. We therefore tend to relegate them to the realm of remote "tin foil hat conspiracy theories" and to focus instead on more congenial stuff -- the latest sex scandal, Hillary Clinton's campaign van parking in a disabled-only space and other matters unlikely to impact America to an extent even approaching that of an EMP attack. Meanwhile, most of "our" Congress Critters, who should know better, focus on opinion polls, filling their campaign coffers and getting richer personally while neglecting our atrophying missile defense systems and other potential means of avoiding or recovering from an EMP attack.
Here is a 2013 video about the likelihood of an Iranian EMP attack on America that would paralyze the country for a very long time.
[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N90o-7a-kLE]
North Korea and the Islamic Republic of Iran have long cooperated in the development of nukes and means to deliver them. I wrote about their cooperation here, here, here and elsewhere. It now appears that Iran intends to use them for an EMP attack on America.
The issue of a nuclear EMP attack was raised in the final hours of this week’s elections in Israel when U.S. authority Peter Vincent Pry penned a column for Arutz Sheva warning of Iran’s threat to free nations.“Iranian military documents describe such a scenario — including a recently translated Iranian military textbook that endorses nuclear EMP attack against the United States,” he wrote. [Emphasis added.]
Here is a March 7, 2015 video about the impact of the P5+1 "negotiations" on Iran getting (or keeping) nukes and the likelihood of an Iranian EMP attack on America:
[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PgvI3V3JE0c]
In April of this year, John Bolton had this to say about the Iran - North Korea connection, how much we don't know and the ongoing P5+1 "negotiations."
[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oicS18ibxkQ]
Perhaps Israel can take out Iran's nuke capabilities.
Here is a February 2015 video about what's (not) being done to harden our domestic power grid:
[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vYcu3OxuWUY]
As of February of this year, Govtrack US opined that the chances of passage of the SHIELD act were zero percent. Be that as it may, simply hardening the power grid would not solve communications or transport problems -- most modern communications devices, as well as vehicles built after 1987, depend on computer chips and, when the chips are fried, will not function. Even if food and water could be processed, getting them to consumers in sufficient quantities to keep them alive would be an enormous if not impossible task.
Problems of a human nature would also arise and remaining alive would be difficult. If one's family were about to starve, how many would try to steal food and water from those who still have even enough for a few days? How many roving gangs of armed criminals, quite willing to kill, would do the same? The police would likely have no communications ability and might well be otherwise occupied, tending to their own families. Military forces not confined to base would likely have the same problems and be doing the same.
That suggests another problem in restoring infrastructure seriously damaged or destroyed by the EMP attack. It would not only require the availability of transport, communications and undamaged equipment. It would also require the availability of personnel, not otherwise occupied in scrounging for food, water, medical supplies and other resources to care for their own families, while protecting them from those lacking such resources, as well as from armed gangs.
Now, the U.S. military is taking steps to protect itself by reopening a cold war bunker at Cheyenne Mountain, abandoned in 2006.
Cheyene Mt. Complex
The Pentagon last week [early April 2015] announced a $700 million contract with Raytheon Corporation to oversee the work for North American Aerospace Command (NORAD) and US Northern Command.Admiral William Gortney, head of NORAD and Northern Command, said that 'because of the very nature of the way that Cheyenne Mountain's built, it's EMP-hardened.'
. . . .
'And so, there's a lot of movement to put capability into Cheyenne Mountain and to be able to communicate in there,' Gortney told reporters.
'My primary concern was... are we going to have the space inside the mountain for everybody who wants to move in there, and I'm not at liberty to discuss who's moving in there,' he said. [Emphasis added.]
The Cheyenne mountain bunker is a half-acre cavern carved into a mountain in the 1960s that was designed to withstand a Soviet nuclear attack. From inside the massive complex, airmen were poised to send warnings that could trigger the launch of nuclear missiles.
But in 2006, officials decided to move the headquarters of NORAD and US Northern Command from Cheyenne to Petersen Air Force base in Colorado Springs. The Cheyenne bunker was designated as an alternative command center if needed.
Now the Pentagon is looking at shifting communications gear to the Cheyenne bunker, officials said.
'A lot of the back office communications is being moved there,' said one defense official.
Officials said the military's dependence on computer networks and digital communications makes it much more vulnerable to an electromagnetic pulse, which can occur naturally or result from a high-altitude nuclear explosion.
Under the 10-year contract, Raytheon is supposed to deliver 'sustainment' services to help the military perform 'accurate, timely and unambiguous warning and attack assessment of air, missile and space threats' at the Cheyenne and Petersen bases.
Raytheon's contract also involves unspecified work at Vandenberg Air Force Base in California and Offutt Air Force Base in Nebraska.
When will the site be fully operational, for what and who will be allowed to go there?
Some other military bases are probably being hardened, at least to an extent that might (or might not) preserve their electrical grids. If it works, they may serve as refugee centers for adjacent civilian populations. However, the military installations would likely run out of food and potable water before very long and, with food and water processing centers no longer operational, there would be substantial difficulties in getting -- as well as transporting -- large quantities of food and water. Were the processing centers to become operational, transportaion difficulties would remain. Communications between the military installations and the outside world? Likely zilch, at least initially, because radios, telephones and other modern communications devices (as most now are) depend on computer chips and would be fried by an EMP attack. Some might eventually be restored at some military bases, but that is not likely to be the case with those not on those bases.
Conclusions
What would you do in the event of an EMP attack? In a major metropolitan area, you would probably be SOL very quickly. In a small town? Marginally but not much better off. An isolated small farm, close to a mountain spring and adequately stocked with food, medical supplies, firearms and ammunition, could provide reason to hope that you might eventually be able to grow or slaughter sufficient food and have access to enough potable water to survive; at least until roving armed gangs arrive and overpower you.
This video is about a massive world-wide pandemic. In the event of a pandemic, electricity, automobiles and communications would still function, at least for a while. Following an EMP attack, the consequences would likely be substantially worse and last far longer.
[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KwymCRaIbSU]
Here is a link to a novel about one family in a small city and its efforts to survive an EMP attack on America. It does a reasonable job of summarizing the potential consequences.
No one knows how good an EMP attack would be—would it black out the nation—or just part of it? Would it cause collapse or just make America vindictive. In any case—subs at sea would launch a counter-strike on any nation that attacked us—or where the bomb came from. Any nation would ceast to exist, becoming a place of ruines, death and radiation. No rational people want to die—so an attack might not be coming. Even if Iran gets the bomb—will they hit Israel—and face obliteration?
Actually we’ve got plenty of idea of how an EMP would be. We’ve measured them, we know how they work, we know what kind of electronics are vulnerable. It isn’t some great mystery, we’ve done, and continue to do (under ground with high tech “cheats”), a lot of nuclear tests.
And as you point out, even if it was extremely effective we’ve got plenty of retaliation force it couldn’t possibly effect. That was after all the whole point of mutually assured destruction. Nobody can take us out hard enough that we can’t take them out too.
What we know so far from the facts.
* Iran can detonate nuclear weapons in the ionosphere over the U.S.A. (see news about Iranian satellite launches in links posted earlier in the thread). So can North Korea. The two nations have been cooperating with each other in their nuclear weapons buildups while getting technical aid and equipment from Russia and China.
* Such high altitude EMP strikes are obviously planned by our enemies to shut down our satellites, communications facilities, power grids and transportation before attacking our military installations and cities with nuclear weapons.
* Iran is willing to take millions of casualties while attacking us (see comments of Ahmadinejad about the “Mahdi” and history of Iran’s casualties and Iranian families’ acceptance of martyrdom of their sons in the Eight Year War with Iraq).
* Iran is not alone in its effort. There are also North Korea, and the suppliers of both nations: Russia and China.
Our own Secretary of Defense and top Admiral during the Bush Administration both cautioned against attacking Iran’s nuclear facilities with conventional weapons. Their statements were revealing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.