[IChing]

Speculation about whether Slager got taxed aside, what 101stAirborneVet said in his earlier comment about the moment of decision to shoot, and the psychological kinesis or inertia that involves, will probably sum up this case. At :17-18, Slager is justified in deciding to draw and fire. The only charges he should face should have to do with the fact that he looks to have failed to suddenly reverse himself in the chaos of change, and instead followed through on his decision. Whether that amounts to guilt on any charge is in question, given the science of decision making and action under extreme stress.

[IChing]

taxed, not taxed, danged auto

[DoodleDawg]

The only charges he should face should have to do with the fact that he looks to have failed to suddenly reverse himself in the chaos of change, and instead followed through on his decision.

He killed an unarmed man posing no threat to Slager or anyone else. He should face far more than that.

[Crim]

“Speculation about whether Slager got taxed aside”

What the hell...that was the whole premis of this thread.