Posted on 04/04/2015 8:30:38 AM PDT by HomerBohn
Andrew Hanen is the Texas judge who has stood in the way of Barack Obama’s illegal executive amnesty, even going so far as to threaten Obama’s Justice Department with perjury, which would have provided many of his donors with cheap labor and was an obvious violation of the law.
As a result of his actions, Americans have benefited from increased wages. However, the attorney that first filed an amnesty challenge before Judge Hanen has now submitted 150 pages of documented evidence concerning Obama’s fraudulent Social Security number before the judge.
Attorney and medical doctor Orly Taitz, who has been involved in numerous cases involving Obama’s fraudulent documentation, submitted the very first challenge to Obama’s illegal executive amnesty, long before the twenty-six states, which most people have heard about in the media, filed theirs. By the time those states had issued challenges before the court, Taitz already had two injunction hearings before the Texas judge and got an order to show cause, which was issue by Judge Hanen.
Following her efforts, Taitz also filed a motion which seeks to amend her complain to include new additional facts. Among those facts are that many of the illegal aliens that are in the united States are using fraudulent identification, including stolen Social Security numbers. In fact, Taitz claims that she has been the victim of identity theft. Her Social Security number was stolen, according to an admission of by the Internal Revenue Service.
“When I sought a copy of the fraudulent tax return and request for refund filed by the thief with the IRS, I was denied my request,” wrote Taitz. “I could get the identity of the thief by the bank account number which the thief attached to his request for a refund.”
“The IRS is aiding and abetting criminals by refusing to provide victims with information,” Taitz told Sons of Liberty Media.
This led to her then providing Judge Hanen with 150 pages of evidence concerning the fraudulent identity of Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barry Soetoro, aka Barry Soebarkah. After all, if illegal aliens are doing this, and the idea is to help hold them accountable under the law, why is the chief law enforcer in the country involved in the same criminal activity.
Obama is using a stolen Social Security number, as we have documented previously. There has been absolutely no credible rebuttal of that fact.
His Social Security number is 042-68-4425 and was issued by Connecticut, though he never lived in the state. In fact, that number was actually issued to one Harry Bounel, who was born in 1890!
Taitz recently called on actor George Clooney‘s wife, Amal Almuddin Clooney, to investigate Obama’s fraudulent identification.
Taitz told Sons of Liberty Media that her efforts were in large part due to the fact that many of the illegals coming across the border were not only are stealing identifications, but they are coming into the US with infectious diseases. Part of one of her motions was to deal with that issue. As a medical doctor, Taitz confirmed what Border Patrol has been telling us concerning those with infectious diseases crossing the US/Mexico border.
Now the question remains how Judge Andrew Hanen will rule once he sees all of the evidence. It appears we are not going to see any constitutional efforts to impeach Barack Obama by Congress, though that would be the rightful remedy in this matter. However, a Texas judge taking a stand against the usurper-in-chief has already drawn many Americans to his aid. I wonder if he would do the same thing regarding the crime of identity theft that the current occupant of the White House is engaged in.
They don't but SSNs have a numbering system that identifies where it was issued, at least the area. The idea that we have no database that identifies every SSN holder is ludicrous.
It’s not illegal to vote for an ineligible President. The US Constitution was developed after a delegation of some of the sovereignty that was gifted to the people and the states by God. God did not bestow sovereignty upon the US Constitution or Congress or the Supreme Court. The people and the states delegated sovereignty, immunities and privileges to the US federal government and may cancel the delegation of authority by electing an ineligible President.
The Eligibility Clause is not used to prevent the will of the people. The Eligibility Clause is used to determine if the people have cancelled the delegation of authority granted to the US federal government by the American people.
Review the Noel Canning Apppointments Clause challenge in the courts against the NRLB. The courts ruled Obama violated the Appointments Clause. Obama wasn’t removed from office for violating the Constitution. Obama was put in office by the will of the people. The courts are not authorized to terminate the will of the people. The courts are authorized to terminate the appointments made in violation of the Appointments Clause and rule all of the actions by those appointees are voided.
With a violation of the Eligibility Clause, the ineligible President is not removed. The courts and the Congress are servants of the people. The appointments, bills signed into law, and all others actions of the ineligible President are voided because the people have voted to install an ineligible President and move forward with new, national governing decree.
I never said that it was illegal to vote for an illegal president. I posted the federal regulation (Administrative Law) which states that two members of Congress (one must be a Senator and one must be a representative) can challenge the Electors of any president-elect and then both Houses of Congress must convene separately and consider the challenge. Members of Congress alleging an ineligible president-elect would have led to a fascinating debate in Congress.
It is the Electors and Congress via votes in a dual session who choose the president, not the popular vote of citizens
Additionally, if an opposition political party controls either House of Congress (or both Houses), members of that party can simply refuse to send any bills to the desk of an ineligible president; thus effectively shutting down the federal government until the usurper resident vacates the People’s House.
An honest judge that will be ridiculed if he rules on this.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.