I have read so many vile, disgusting things about Christians and Republicans posted by people on the other side of this argument. I’m not willing to stoop to the same level. Our argument is the winning argument intellectually. We don’t need to disparage anyone in doing so. That’s the tactic of the Alinski-ites.
That’s the tactic of the Alinski-ites.
The Alinskys are winning, or haven’t you noticed?
I'm old-school Free Republic, and I know that the only way you get these peoples' attention is with a sand-coated thumb in the eye.
"Sure, I'll bake you a gay "wedding cake". You can pick it up at the Fedex kiosk in Tikrit..."
An accurate description of a vile, disgusting act must BE vile and disgusting. Otherwise you are playing games.
" I’m not willing to stoop to the same level. Our argument is the winning argument intellectually. We don’t need to disparage anyone in doing so. That’s the tactic of the Alinski-ites."
All right, give me a nice, polite, sanitized, acceptable description of anal sex between men and ingestion of feces. Go ahead. How can we make that pretty and pleasant if we're going to tell the truth?
It is stunning that there are still some conservatives who believe we can play by polite rules and beat these people. What will it take to wake you up?
Let there be truth. We need not lie about the perversions of homosexuality. Just spell it out.
The people who decry the truth engage in practices which are abhorrent to the sensibilities of normal folks, and it isn't lying to point out those practices.
Phil Robertson wasn't "hating" when he said that he couldn't understand the behaviours of homosexuals. If the homosexuals have such "Pride" in what they do, why do they call it "Hate" when someone points out what that is?
Because as long as they hide behind a wall of media deception portraying their lifestyle as normal or even 'cute', people will not see the things they would otherwise recoil from as unnatural.