Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: lexington minuteman 1775

The question is now not who is running, but who isn’t running? Democrats have what, 3-4 candidates tops? Republicans can have 7-8 at the least. I think that’s a big part of the problem.


23 posted on 03/21/2015 7:37:46 AM PDT by Politicalkiddo (You know it's bad when you actually wish that someone would replace your senators with horses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: Politicalkiddo
Republicans can have 7-8 at the least. I think that’s a big part of the problem.

With due respect I disagree - at least, it's not necessarily the problem - altho it can become that. Take 2011-12 cycle - when there were 8 candidates at one time. There was still one candidate, and only one candidate, who showed how to win Republican voters while ginning up big turn outs and enthusiasm. Now, he forgot how, but that speaks to his own weaknesses, not the size of the field....because the field was down to about 4 when he screwed the pooch.

27 posted on 03/21/2015 7:40:59 AM PDT by C. Edmund Wright (www.FireKarlRove.com NOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: Politicalkiddo
The question is now not who is running, but who isn’t running? Democrats have what, 3-4 candidates tops? Republicans can have 7-8 at the least.

Same tactic got Linseed Graham re-re-elected last year.
38 posted on 03/21/2015 7:54:18 AM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson