Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Politicalkiddo
The question is now not who is running, but who isn’t running? Democrats have what, 3-4 candidates tops? Republicans can have 7-8 at the least.

Same tactic got Linseed Graham re-re-elected last year.
38 posted on 03/21/2015 7:54:18 AM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: Resettozero

“Same tactic got Linseed Graham re-re-elected last year.”

Yup.


49 posted on 03/21/2015 8:07:38 AM PDT by Politicalkiddo (You know it's bad when you actually wish that someone would replace your senators with horses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: Resettozero
Same tactic got Linseed Graham re-re-elected last year.

Actually, that's not what happened. The large field is what gave any chance at all to keep Lindsey under 50% in the primary, thus forcing a run-off. In a run-off, it would have been one against one. The thing that got Lindsey re-elected was A: he had a huge advantage inherently as a long time powerful incumbent and B: Graham wisely used that advantage and early on he made deals with would be supporters not to run and not to support anyone who does (Gowdy for example) and C: the only one remaining with the chops was Lee Bright, but he had other obstacles that were very problematic.

As it turned out, Lee trounced the field for second place, even as he had a much smaller budget than all the others, but Graham came in comfortably at 56%.

65 posted on 03/21/2015 9:02:46 AM PDT by C. Edmund Wright (www.FireKarlRove.com NOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson