Posted on 02/22/2015 2:24:25 AM PST by Beckwith
Let's say a man was elected to the highest office in the land who had been mentored, during his childhood, by an avowed communist who was identified as a member of the Communist Party USA (card number 47544) by the Commission on Subversive Activities to the Legislature of the Territory of Hawaii, accused by the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) as being active in several communist-front organizations, and had a thick FBI file.
Let us further say that this man's guardian, his grandfather, had chosen this mentor for him, indicating that he was likely sympathetic to the mentor's beliefs.
Now, let us say that upon reaching college, this man gravitated toward Marxist professors and revolutionaries and attended the Socialist Scholars Conferences (SSC) at Cooper Union, that featured the elite of socialist academia as well as union activists, political revolutionaries, reformers, and opponents of "corporate greed."
After graduating from college, this man is tutored in the "agitation" techniques of a professional agitator, a former Jesuit priest, and a former ACLU director -- all dedicated socialists.
As a "community organizer, this man had an intimate and long-term association with ACORN (Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now), the largest radical group in America and the publishers of a communist manifesto entitled "ACORN's Peoples Platform" which would become this man's agenda.
While associated with ACORN, this man was a consultant and trainer to Project Vote, best know for its massive and flagrant election tampering.
Now, let's say this leader-to-be spent twenty years sitting in a black nationalist church, led by a leftist black nationalist preacher, who unabashedly preached a racist "black" gospel" based on the Marxist "Theology of Liberation" that "will accept only the love of God which participates in the destruction of the white enemy."
The man's political career began in the living room of two communist domestic terrorists, where he was introduced to the cream of the local leftist community by his political mentor, who was a member of the U.S. Peace Council, which the FBI identified as a communist front group, an affiliate of the World Peace Council, a Soviet front group.
As part of his first run for state office, this man became a member of the New Party and sought their endorsement. The New Party's objective was to push forth the socialist principles of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA).
The New Party required candidates who received the endorsement sign a pledge of support for the party that was, in effect, a front group for communists. The July issue of the New Ground noted that 15% of the New Party consisted of DSA members and a good number of members of the Committees of Correspondence for Democracy and Socialism, a democratic socialist group in the United States which originated in 1991 as the Committees of Correspondence, a moderate, dissenting wing of the Communist Party USA.
This man also had close personal and political ties to many socialists and communists, including Timuel Black, Congressman Danny Davis, Carl Davidson, Marilyn Katz, Mike Klonsky, Saul Mendelson, Abner Mikva, Linda Rae Murray, Lou Pardo, Zach Pollet, Wade Rathke, Joel Rogers, Quentin Young, Rabbi Arnold Jacob Wolf, and DSA honorees Jackie Grimshaw, Jackie Kendall and Congresswoman Jan Schakowsky, to name a few.
Now, when this man ran for national office, all of the above, which is really a snapshot of this man's activities and associations, was forgotten, ignored and buried by the media.
But once in high office this man appointed to his administration the likes of David Axelrod, Anita Dunn, Patrick Gaspard, Jeff Jones, Van Jones, Ron Bloom, Rosa Brooks, Carol Browner, Heather Higginbottom, Mark Lloyd, Hannah Rosenthal, Hilda Solis, and Cass Sunstein. -- all Marxists of one stripe or another -- and these are just some of the ones we know of.
So, here's the billion-dollar question:
What would be nuttier: to claim that this man was a life-long Marxist, or to claim that such an assertion is absurd?
All sources and links for the above are at http://theobamafile.com/_obamunism/BarackObamaMarxist.htm
The media can’t afford to act like journalists. Not now.
What does “fair” have to do with the truth?
“You have to pinch yourself - a Marxist radical who all his life has been mentored by, sat at the feet of, worshiped with, befriended, endorsed the philosophy of, funded and been in turn funded, politically promoted and supported by a nexus comprising black power anti-white racists, Jew-haters, revolutionary Marxists, unrepentant former terrorists and Chicago mobsters, is on the verge of becoming President of the United States. And apparently it’s considered impolite to say so.” - Melanie Philips, The Spectator (UK) 10/14/08
After six years of rack and ruin it's still impolite to tell the truth about him.
you are correct,
The media has too much invested in obammy.
Frank Marshall Davis was a literal card-carrying communist.
...Obama was mentored by Frank Marshall Davis. Davis worked with the Canter family, who mentored David Axelrod. Davis also worked with Vernon Jarrett and Robert Taylor, father-in-law and grandfather to Valerie Jarrett. They all served together in Chicago’s Communist Party circles in the 1940s.
Obama's political ancestor worked with the political ancestors of Axelrod and Jarrett.
That would be good. Here on FR we’ve been yelling ‘til we’re blue in the face since 2007.
It sure was fair. The media’s been going back to dig up Scott Walkers PE teacher from third grade....
And Obama’s next move is to control the internet. Once he does this it is a fait accompli
I agree. The likes of Obama deliberately saying “ISIL” not ISIS. ISIL is a term that Muslims understand and it is demeaning to the Jewish leader.
Time to buy a CB and short wave/ham radio.
Don’t forget Tim Geitner’s father was once Obama’s mother’s boss. Kind off incestuous what these Commies have had planned for years,huh?
These questions should have been answered in 2008 and 2012.
ISIL is a Muslim term/word that does not include Israel as a nation/country. The use of the word demeans Jews and Jewish residents of Israel. Do you understand now?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.