Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Elsie

Yes, it was a sign of the covenant between God and his people prior to Christ. Baptism replaces circumcision as a sign of the covenant between God and his people. His people are now not limited to believing Jews (it never was, anyone who came to faith in the Old Testament who was not an ethnic Jew could be circumcised into the covenant) but include as one of the Psalms states “a people yet unknown.” In other words, the Covenant extends to all believers and their households via baptism in the same manner that circumcision extended not just to Abraham but to his entire household.


21 posted on 02/23/2015 5:08:33 AM PST by LeoMcNeil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: LeoMcNeil
Baptism replaces circumcision as a sign of the covenant between God and his people.

News to me.

Where do I find this information?

23 posted on 02/23/2015 12:02:40 PM PST by Elsie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson