Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: mosesdapoet

No, that has nothing to do with having an HOA.

It was a Contract between the Landowner and his Tenants. I would say Lease, but a Lease has a time restriction

I would assume that there an “out” in case the Property was Transferred or Sold. I’m sure there is more to the story. My Land, my Rules.

I’m not big a fan of Rent Control, so I can see the Buyer doing whatever they needed to do to get a profitable return on their Investment.

If you don’t want a Landlord, buy your own Land and House.


95 posted on 02/08/2015 4:07:28 PM PST by Kickass Conservative (If you think the Mulatto Marxist is bad, just wait until the Menopausal Marxist shows up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: Kickass Conservative

No, that has nothing to do with having an HOA.
It was a Contract between the Landowner and his Tenants. I would say Lease, but a Lease has a time restriction.

Had a chance to question Don. tonight and found out that belonging to this particular association was an $20 a month elective. Which my biddy buddy did. But it was run more like a co-op buyers group for maintainence and construction work. And because less than 70% of the owners belonged to it when this Senior Housing trailer park was sold the new owners changed it to general no age restricted and jacked up the lot rental.


111 posted on 02/08/2015 7:41:36 PM PST by mosesdapoet (Some of my best rebuttals are in FR's along with meaningless venting no one reads.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson