Sarah Palin, Yes!
1 posted on
02/06/2015 9:26:35 PM PST by
upsdriver
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
To: onyx; KC_Lion
2 posted on
02/06/2015 9:29:40 PM PST by
upsdriver
(Palin/West)
To: KC_Lion; upsdriver; USS Alaska; Varmint Al; verga; victim soul; VinL; vox_freedom; weston; ...
3 posted on
02/06/2015 9:33:10 PM PST by
onyx
(Please Support Free Republic - Donate Monthly! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, Let Me know!)
To: upsdriver
yes PRESIDENT PALIN has a nice ring to it =)
To: upsdriver
It would truly scare the hooie out of the libs. Like sprinkling holy water on the possessed. I could probably get behind a Palin run. She hasn’t been corrupted or bought or paid for by DC insiders. She’s not even welcome by the DC insiders. That says a lot. They haven’t figured out how to use her yet for THEIR causes. She baffles them. And she don’t take no sh*t. I’m really not so sure about everyone else yet. It’ll be awhile before I sort out what I think about all these wanna-be’s.
7 posted on
02/06/2015 9:37:40 PM PST by
bluejean
(The lunatics are running the asylum)
To: upsdriver
9 posted on
02/06/2015 9:39:08 PM PST by
Jemian
(War Eagle!)
To: upsdriver; stephenjohnbanker; Gilbo_3; Impy; NFHale; GOPsterinMA; BillyBoy; fieldmarshaldj; ...
RE:”
Third, Palin is electable whether she takes Scott Walker, Michele Bachmann, or Newt Gingrich along doesn't really matter. With her at the top of the ticket, the media will go berserk, and the same four million Tea Party voters who stayed home in 2012 will put her into the White House with a massive majority. “ What? Is it 2011 again?
Did a time machine just take us back four years when we were assured by the Palinistas over and over and over that she WAS GOING TO beat Romney then Obama?
Over and over and over....
If so I can tell how this ends.
13 posted on
02/06/2015 9:45:54 PM PST by
sickoflibs
(King Obama : 'The debate is over. The time for talk is over. Just follow my commands you serfs""')
To: upsdriver
I don’t believe this is going to happen, at least not for 2016. Least of the reasons will be that too many elected republicans will be openly working against her for their own reasons. Too many ‘Tokyo Roves’ with ongoing media influence. Too many who become conveniently mute or invisible when challenged, i.e. Reince Priebus (The Ever-Shrinking Violet) I hope that I’m proven wrong. I would be most pleased and thankful.
To: upsdriver
The thing that many do not seem to have considered is that there is little chance some white guy is going to pull the vote away from the likely female candidate of the Left.
A man will be at a disadvantage in any debate, simply because if he loses, "She kicked his butt!" and if he wins, he is a Meanie! ("Did you see how that A**hole treated that nice lady").
Guys, if you ever argued with a woman, you know what I am talking about.
The only person who can mop the floor with Fauxcahontas or Cankles and not be portrayed as a male chauvanist pig is....a woman.
Imho, Sarah can handle either and come out on top.
If she does well that will likely shift a chunk of the woman's vote to her. Otherwise, gender solidarity will prevail surely as racial solidarity and white guilt carried the king of the FSA into power.
18 posted on
02/06/2015 9:53:18 PM PST by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
To: upsdriver
Third, Palin is electable whether she takes Scott Walker, Michele Bachmann, or Newt Gingrich
**
You’ve been into the cooking sherry tonight, haven’t you?
To: upsdriver
Your headline stinks, you infer that she is running!!!
30 posted on
02/06/2015 10:05:04 PM PST by
dalereed
To: upsdriver
The libs’ heads would literally explode if she ran. Ditto for the GOPe.
To: upsdriver
Sarah Palin has continued to be engaged in the political dialog unlike any other figure on the national scene. She is what I call the female Will Rogers of our times.
58 posted on
02/06/2015 11:06:41 PM PST by
jonrick46
(The opium of Communists: other people's money.)
To: upsdriver
I wrote her in last time and will again this time. Wow, someone to vote for instead of against.
62 posted on
02/06/2015 11:11:38 PM PST by
HANG THE EXPENSE
(Life's tough.It's tougher when you're stupid.)
To: upsdriver
...someone who can rise above the mass media's hate-fueled attacks...If she runs, you ain't seen nuthin' yet! The hate will boil endlessly!
70 posted on
02/06/2015 11:34:48 PM PST by
JimRed
(Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
To: upsdriver
I'd vote for Palin. Not Bush, not Romney, not Christie, not Jindal, not Rubio. But I would vote for Palin. Put her on a ticket with Cruz, or Gingrich, or my Governor Walker and you have a guaranteed 2016 victory. I do think, however, she closes the deal better as VP.
71 posted on
02/06/2015 11:36:56 PM PST by
so_real
( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
To: upsdriver
She has the potential to do what Nigel Farage has done with UKIP in the UK.
She can draw people from both major parties into supporting an alternative to business as usual politics that bails out the big guys at the expense of the little guys.
76 posted on
02/07/2015 12:04:54 AM PST by
Nextrush
(OBAMACARE IS A BAILOUT FOR THE HEALTHCARE INDUSTRY)
To: upsdriver
What is with the misplaced semicolon?
Palin is also misplaced as an actually running candidate. She won’t be.
75% of Americans think, no, they are SURE, Sarah Palin is stupid. The media won. She is not stupid. I agree with everything she says. She is the real deal. But she is UNELECTABLE for national office. It’s a done deal.
77 posted on
02/07/2015 12:07:17 AM PST by
Yaelle
(No Cruz? Then "I'm Ready for Hillary; What Difference Does It Make?")
To: upsdriver
Yup, Sarah Palin all the way!
80 posted on
02/07/2015 12:21:47 AM PST by
BerryDingle
(I know how to deal with communists, I still wear their scars on my back from Hollywood-Ronald Reagan)
To: upsdriver
If Sarah runs, she would be great. I won’t get excited until summer rolls around.
88 posted on
02/07/2015 5:53:36 AM PST by
Thumper1960
(A modern so-called "Conservative" is a shadow of a wisp of a vertebrate human being.)
To: upsdriver
President No. 45.
Accept no substitutes.
90 posted on
02/07/2015 6:03:42 AM PST by
exit82
("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson