If that's the case, then why aren't they pushing to repeal those laws now? Why haven't they pushed it before now?
Luckily there's no evidence for it, and the side effects of vaccines are well-known and carry the same rare amounts of risk as most medical treatments.
And there's no [real] evidence for anthropogenic global warming, yet there are policies being set, forced because of it; why do you wish to deny your fellow citizen self-sovereignty under threat of government coercion?
I'm only calling for it in schools where children congregate. If you don't want to vaccinate your child, then you keep them home.
It's silly to try and say that it's an attack on individual liberty if your fellow citizens make it more difficult for you and your children to spread preventable, serious, possibly deadly illnesses because you believe in pseudoscience.
Do you have the right to spread dangerous diseases?
Does a child with the measles have the right to go to school with hundreds of other children?
And there's no [real] evidence for anthropogenic global warming,
The difference is the track record. Vaccines work. Do you deny the eradication of smallpox occurred? Do you deny that many deadly diseases have been eradicated and/or reduced because of inoculation, or do you think it's because we just wash our hands more often?
We have yet to see evidence of government regulations affecting the climate. Not so with vaccination; we've seen the results and they're a gift from God.