Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Restaurants Struggle to Comply with Calorie Labeling Requirements Under ObamaCare
FreedomWorks ^ | January 28, 2015 | Tom Borelli

Posted on 02/01/2015 3:05:16 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks

The command and control mandates of ObamaCare continue to cause unintended consequences for businesses.

In another example of government gone wild, the federal government is now forcing restaurants to post the calorie information of its menu items.

Late last year, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a final rule under ObamaCare that requires retail food establishments with the same name and 20 or more locations to list calorie information for its standard menu offerings.

The regulation applies to many food retail operations including restaurants, delicatessens, supermarkets and movie theaters to name a few.

The goal of this regulatory effort is to combat obesity by providing calorie content of menu items for retail food operations to consumers.

By mandating retail food establishments to list nutritional information for its products, the government feels consumers will make healthier choices and this action is justified because a significant amount of food is consumed outside the home.

For FDA bureaucrats divorced from the real world, writing regulations like this makes sense but in the real world of retail food service it’s a nightmare.

While the calorie labeling standard for food retail outlets mandated by ObamaCare will likely make former nanny state New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg happy, it’s causing havoc for restaurant chains.

Domino’s Pizza explained the difficulty of complying with the regulation to The Washington Free Beacon.

According to the restaurant chain, the definition of a “menu” described in the regulation is so poorly written that a sign or a television advertisement could trigger the calorie information requirement.

The regulation is particularly burdensome for Domino’s because of the vast number of combinations a customer can order. In theory, each pizza combination must carry a calorie count.

Domino’s is justified in opposing this regulation because of the stiff penalties for violating the FDA’s edict.

In its usual heavy handed approach to regulation, failing to meet FDA’s requirement could result in government seizing the “misbranded” food, fines and jail.

Could you imagine going to jail for breaking the calorie labeling limit by putting too much pepperoni on a pizza?

The FDA regulation is a reminder that with ObamaCare the government has its nose under the health care tent and can interfere with all aspects of behavior.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Food; Government; Health/Medicine
KEYWORDS: caloriecounts; menulabeling; nannystate; obamacare; obesity; restaurants
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last
To: MeshugeMikey; Ezekiel

Captures it nicely.

Dominos falling :o(


41 posted on 02/02/2015 5:54:41 AM PST by cyn (Benghazi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Ezekiel

// These writers really need to quit using the phrase “unintended consequences”. Of course they are intended. //

Tramping like godzillas (little god) over everything good.


42 posted on 02/02/2015 6:02:37 AM PST by cyn (Benghazi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

That would not be acceptable because too many can’t add.


43 posted on 02/02/2015 6:06:59 AM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
When Government Attacks!
44 posted on 02/02/2015 7:48:38 AM PST by kiryandil (making the jests that some FReepers aren't allowed to...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

How about requiring all legislation to show the budget impact of each paragraph, a list of the authors of the paragraph, and the main beneficiaries?


45 posted on 02/03/2015 9:09:27 AM PST by posterchild (It takes a politician to declare a settled science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson