Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: BRL
But he didn't frame it as absolute free speech. The article says, "Therefore the discussion shouldn’t be around yes or no to free speech but about what should limit free speech and why."

The problem isn't absolute free speech or not. The problem is understanding what free speech means. Free speech should be absolute, yes. The government has no moral authority to tell people what they can't say. But free speech does not mean that people don't have a right to be offended by what you say, or that you aren't responsible for direct consequences of what you say.

Too many people confuse "free speech" with the different notion that you shouldn't be responsible or criticized for your speech.

30 posted on 01/27/2015 11:41:36 AM PST by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: mlo
God and I love how the left constantly, everywhere, every time, trot out the “fire in the theater” argument. Seriously is there some handbook out there or something for liberal objections to rational thought?
31 posted on 01/27/2015 2:06:11 PM PST by Sam Gamgee (May God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't. - Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson