Replies

So I keep asking: "Do you agree with DL and the others who read Vattel into Article II or do you agree with Mr. Robinson and me that such theory is a bunch of historical and Constitutional hooey?" That's the keep-on-topic question.

This is coercion from down the barrel of a gun, and it demonstrates what a piece of scum you are. Why resort to facts and reason when you can use arm twisting?

That demonstrates exactly the sort of person you are. You don't want the truth, you want compliance. I believe the Nazis called this "Gleichschaltung ".

Best proof ever that you're a Liberal. Punishing dissent is their goto tactic.

You don't want the truth, you want compliance.

Lacking the specification in the Constitution itself concerning the definition of natural born citizen and irregardless of evidence given, someone seeking the truth might try looking at the question from a different direction, such as-

If the Founders wrote natural born citizen, how many natural parents did it take to make the natural born child?

or even from a mathematical standpoint:
If 1/2 + 1/2 = 1, how can 1/2 + 0 = 1 whole?

Just sayin'. :-)

Thanks, DL. He’s a bully but he doesn’t bother me. This is because if he strays even a centimeter off the one narrow topic to which he has the talking points down cold, he makes moronically stupid comments. I’m incapable of being intimidated by anyone sufficiently stupid to make the kind of idiotic pronouncements this person has made the instant—the very instant—he goes off his rote replies.

CH, I’m ready to make a deal with you. Now listen closely; you have a history of wholesale misunderstandings re: most of what you read that you don’t agree with. So pay attention.

Do this. Find me a quote from one of the Founding Fathers that says ‘in the future’ - i.e.: subsequent to the grandfather clause - they would be fine with a POTUS born of permanently foreign/anti-American parents, so long as the child was born on American soil. You find and post that quote, and I will respond to the question you ask with parrot-like repetition, as if without that one question you are a verbal cripple incapable of rational discussion.

Take your time finding the quote. I’ll wait.

This is coercion from down the barrel of a gun, and it demonstrates what a piece of scum you are. Why resort to facts and reason when you can use arm twisting.

Oh, c'mon. Stop the melodramatics.

The article at the start of this thread asserts to be Presidential eligible a person must be born to citizen parents. I'm merely asking FW if she agrees with that. It's not a complex or coercive question. But yet she evades it.

That the site owner disagrees is simply a point of fact. Though it does cause my eyes to roll every time your or FW suggest that by denying the citizen parent theory I'm advocating some anti-American, anti-Constitutional thing.