Oh, c'mon. Stop the melodramatics.
The article at the start of this thread asserts to be Presidential eligible a person must be born to citizen parents. I'm merely asking FW if she agrees with that. It's not a complex or coercive question. But yet she evades it.
That the site owner disagrees is simply a point of fact. Though it does cause my eyes to roll every time your or FW suggest that by denying the citizen parent theory I'm advocating some anti-American, anti-Constitutional thing.
With no bearing on the topic other than it's use as an implied coercive tactic. You must think we are as stupid as you are.
Though it does cause my eyes to roll every time your or FW suggest that by denying the citizen parent theory I'm advocating some anti-American, anti-Constitutional thing.
Yes, because 11 million + anchor babies are certainly a matter of levity.
Though it does cause my eyes to roll every time your or FW suggest that by denying the citizen parent theory Im advocating some anti-American, anti-Constitutional thing.
Well do you or dont you advocate anti-Americanism in the WH? We have an anti-American there now. He takes after his father, who despised the US, hated what we stand for, and wanted nothing to do with US citizenship. Do you advocate the type of destruction our anti-American ruler has unleashed on the USA or not?