Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: WhiskeyX

Now that I clicked through to the link, I see the headline is misleading. He isn’t talking about tracking bracelets at all.

He is talking about so-called “smart guns” that won’t fire if certain conditions aren’t met, and one of the ideas is that the person might have to wear a bracelet that communicates electronically with the firearm.

Not an appropriate idea for the Federal government to even be thinking about, but it’s not what the headline describes.


31 posted on 01/18/2015 10:07:08 PM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Boogieman

“He is talking about so-called “smart guns” that won’t fire if certain conditions aren’t met, and one of the ideas is that the person might have to wear a bracelet that communicates electronically with the firearm.”

Remember back in 1974 when for one year, cars made you buckle up in order to be able to start them. This nonsense goes right along with this brainless idea, and would last less time if ever implemented.


45 posted on 01/18/2015 10:26:39 PM PST by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: Boogieman

Although if they required them, theRFID chip would make “ concealed carry “ an impossibility....


94 posted on 01/19/2015 6:25:29 AM PST by Kozak ("It may be dangerous to be America's enemy, but to be America's friend is fatal" Henry Kissinger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson