Posted on 12/17/2014 6:51:47 AM PST by rightistight
In an article published by the Guardian, Jess Zimmerman suggested that all men should be murdered. In the same article, she stated that prejudice against men is a good thing.
The article, called No, we dont literally want to ban men. But 2014 was the year women got even, begins with a sarcastic opening paragraph mocking males. It quickly descends further into madness.
In the second paragraph, Zimmerman states that misandry (the hatred of men) had a big year, too, but it looked a little different. For us, it was a tool to help create a less oppressive future. Zimmerman plainly states that a hatred of men is used by feminists to achieve gains.
In the third paragraph, the author then talks about anger online. She then recalls that feminists created the hashtag KillAllMen. Could she possibly be serious? Well, the next paragraph begins, We were joking, sort of, but we were also very serious.
...She then shows her profound confusion and lack of knowledge of the English language by saying that she doesnt want to literally murder all men or launch them into the sun, because she doesnt have the power to do that. But apparently Zimmerman doesnt understand that want and dont have the power to literally dont mean the same thing. She does literally want to ban men, as her entire article outlines. She just doesnt have the power to do so.
(Excerpt) Read more at thepunditpress.com ...
That’s my question about Lesbos in general.
They hate men, but they sure like to act like them.
So when is this thing going to be arrested for her hate speech?
Didn’t Gilbert and Sullivan write an opera about a princess who wanted to get rid of all men?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Princess_Ida
“If you enlist all women in your cause,And make them all abjure tyrannic Man,The obvious question then arises, “How Is this Posterity to be provided?”
I don’t care who ya’are, that right there’s funny.
Most of the hatred comes from envy. Most of the women that hate men really hate themselves first and foremost. They focus on the strengths that men have in some areas and fail to appreciate their own strengths, so they forever try to be like men while forever trying to put them down.
Basically they’re pathetic human beings in desperate need of sympathy, wihich no one is willing to provide because ... well, they’re so unsympathetic.
she most definitely fits Rush’s definition of a feminist...
Undeniable Truth of Life No. 24, written back in 1987: Feminism was established so as to allow unattractive women easier access to the mainstream of society.
The haircut just screams “I’m a lesbian man-hater”.
Valerie Solanas (who advocated the same thing) is still revered as a deep and insightful thinker in “Women’s Studies” programs at universities all across America.
I've always wondered how the Leftist coalition of poor, anti-feminist, anti-homosexual blacks, hispanics, and Muslims gets along so well with rich white homosexuals and feminists in the Democratic Party. I guess hatred of straight white males takes precedence over any dislike they may have towards one another.
There's also the fact that to condescending rich white liberals, non-whites are allowed to do things like hate homosexuals, eat meat, and use guns because they're not fully human, so the same high standards of feminism, support for homosexual marriage, and animal rights don't apply to them.
He'd probably have to charge double or triple his going rate on this one.
” In a civilized country, men like us would be killed. But who would they get to do the killing? “ — Jim Morris, War Story
meet some nice man,and settle down
...you mean some nice, blind man, don’t you...?
Got that right!
Totally.
LOL....
ROTFLMAO!
I don’t think those spirits could escape that hell hole.
Yes, it is!
Hahahahahahahaha!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.