‘Relax. As I said, it’s not a problem. I understand perfectly. I’d be a little embarrassed as well, I might even make up some excuses for not going there. It’s OK.’
This was redundant. You’ve already proved multiple times that you either didn’t read my first post to you or couldn’t comprehend it. But if you feel the need to keep on proving that fact again...and again...and again...and again...etc., etc., no one can stop you. It’s boring and mindlessly repetitious, but otherwise no problem.
‘Clearly, you’ve decided that these official records aren’t of sufficient solidity to prove the case.’
Comprehension is Just Not Your Forte. I decided nothing. Barack Obama and Michelle Obama made the case. I merely quoted them.
‘it seems weird to me that two people would go through a formal divorce if they weren’t ever married’
Common ground at last. It seemed weird to me as well. So much so that I [try to imagine the novelty of it] investigated the issue. That’s what people do, who are looking for the truth.
Well shazam, you’ll never guess what I found. There is one circumstance under which people who have never been legally married get divorced. And Coincidence, Coincidence, WHAT a Coincidence, that one reason ***just happens*** to apply to the Obama scenario. Who could have guessed it???
No, I won’t give you the link. If I could find it, so can you. Happy hunting.
"There is one circumstance under which people who have never been legally married get divorced."
Not legally married but there was a marriage even if it had no legal effect. Careful, you might be adding to the 'evidence for" pile.