Simmer down and switch the green can. You call me a loser because I rightly assess the pansy-load nature of republican leadership? I suppose you admire Boehner and McConnell. I suppose you hang on every word Karl Marx Rove utters. If you like the current state of the GOP-e you’re the south end of a north bound horse.
Have a grown-up reread my original comment and its just possible you’ll find out that I was WONDERING if deadlock was preferable to the go-along-get-along GOP-e
Careful reading is a valuable life skill, look into it.
It pains me to think there may be some positive in voting for a democrat ...
I was able to read quite plainly what you wrote.
I suppose you admire Boehner and McConnell. I suppose you hang on every word Karl Marx Rove utters.
Maybe its you who needs a basic reading comprehension course. Where did you read that statement anywhere in what I wrote?
YOU ASS-umed way too much
...and its just possible youll find out that I was WONDERING if deadlock was preferable....
Not possible at all.
Now you're just "wondering" are you? No, you weren't just wondering anything. The larger quote you wrote is this: "...perhaps the best strategy in the near term is to keep both parties from achieving total control. It pains me to think there may be some positive in voting for a democrat but Im considering the options.
You are speaking personally about what -- in your presumed enlightenment -- YOU are considering doing.
That's not "wondering." Wondering is mere philosophizing. Considering involves the willful act of planning.
You're just using weasel words now as some feeble attempt to back away from what you wrote.
If you think "wondering" is a word equal and interchangeable with the word, "considering," it is evident that you'll need to develop more accomplished English composition skills.
You live in Connecticut as do I. I challenged you to name the (D) YOU are "considering" voting for as a better choice than any other (R) that it is possible for you to vote for.
We're all waiting.
FReegards!