Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: LeoMcNeil
I note you have walked back some of your comments and no longer assert " The Nuremberg trials were nothing but victors justice." You do, it seems to me, still believe Eisenhower and Churchill (and presumably other Americans and British) should be also charged with war crimes. Is the sympathy for the Germans religious in nature or other ?
94 posted on 10/15/2014 6:01:35 AM PDT by af_vet_1981 (The bus came by and I got on, That's when it all began.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]


To: af_vet_1981

Under the precedent set at Nuremberg, Churchill, FDR, Truman, Stalin and any number of Generals could be found guilty of war crimes or waging aggressive war. As such, I find Nuremberg to be hypocritical and nothing more than victors justice. After all, if the precedents set at Nuremberg applied to everyone then Churchill would be guilty concerning the bombing of Dresden and other German cities and Truman would be guilty of dropping nukes in Japan.

If Nuremberg was limited simply to crimes against humanity (read: the systematic murder of civilians, Jews or otherwise) then it wouldn’t have been victors justice. However, obviously, Nuremberg wasn’t limited. We have to look at the entire trial, not just one count.


95 posted on 10/15/2014 6:38:01 AM PDT by LeoMcNeil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson