You use the words of Nazis to indict Luther I don't, because I trust them like Communists.
You decry AS in Luther and and yet don't in anyone else of the period or since absolving Germany in #46.
History records many Nazi leaders as nominal Catholics, factual. Are they Catholic, not in any sense of the word. Did the Lutheran church in its history or proclamations doctrine or operating rules ever condone or practice AS? No they didn't. Did the Catholic church? Yes they did as shown by links to non-Nazi sources.
Given the preceding is true, where would these nominal Catholics most likely have heard AS sentiments in their youth, in their social group, at church or at Martin Luther study?
As for 'faux', the only thing 'faux' is your outrage at AS. Too selective to be believable. That you and the Nazis share a hate of the Reformation doesn't make you a Nazi.
For the comparison between Mo and Luther it doesn't surprise me at all you see no difference between them, your hate has blinded you to the fact that one believed in Christ for his salvation, the other didn't.
Blueprint for the Holocaust: another piece of hyperbole! From the post #48, a chronology of AS behavior by the 'Catholic' church. A cursory reading leading to the 16th century will show that Luther couldn't 'blueprinted' anything (been first author) as AS had been practiced in almost every way by the Catholic church. Arson of synagogues, looting, damning sermons, murder were practiced and condoned by many you now call saints.
With all that in mind, thank you for letting me get that info out to any lurkers out there. The difference between an honest broker and one who uses fake outrage to condemn his religious enemies. Churchmen have sinned through the millenia and continue today. I sin, I am responsible for what I do and don't do. Despite your efforts otherwise, the Nazis are responsible for their sins as well.