Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Ha Ha Thats Very Logical

Mine isn’t new. It’s been out since shortly after the presser where Zullo discussed the codes.

Bottom line for me has always been the truth, nothing else.

Do I think the codes matter at all? Only IF they have secured a genuine copy of the LOCAL/STATE codes. I have confirmed that states had their own, but not which state codes would have matched the federal codes back in 61. Of the 30+ states that I contacted, only a handful could respond with authority. They all said that they doubted any of the old state manuals remained on file, or in archives anywhere. They were discarded once revisions took place.

I have always felt that the revisions to the August ‘61 Fed VSIM would not likely have been to the race codes, but either to geo info or to add more specific wording. WHY change race coding info (the actual codes) mid year? That would result in a huge amount of down stream mess.. But Zullo and Co. got all hung up on that issue.


216 posted on 10/06/2014 4:40:29 PM PDT by Ladysforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies ]


To: Ladysforest
Mine isn’t new. It’s been out since shortly after the presser where Zullo discussed the codes.

That may well be. I just hadn't read it before. I probably started skimming the Zullo topics around about the tenth "we'll soon be announcing earth-shattering evidence!!!" announcement.

The idea that the Federal codes were meant as a way to record what was on the state birth certificates, not for the state employees to encode what was on their own certificates, is so obvious that I'm annoyed with myself for not having thought of it before.

234 posted on 10/06/2014 10:04:32 PM PDT by Ha Ha Thats Very Logical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson