Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Ladysforest
Mine isn’t new. It’s been out since shortly after the presser where Zullo discussed the codes.

That may well be. I just hadn't read it before. I probably started skimming the Zullo topics around about the tenth "we'll soon be announcing earth-shattering evidence!!!" announcement.

The idea that the Federal codes were meant as a way to record what was on the state birth certificates, not for the state employees to encode what was on their own certificates, is so obvious that I'm annoyed with myself for not having thought of it before.

234 posted on 10/06/2014 10:04:32 PM PDT by Ha Ha Thats Very Logical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies ]


To: Ha Ha Thats Very Logical

Unless you read the manual, and summaries, and re-read them, then applied what you had learned to what was ON the BCs, why it was there, when it was applied, and used a little logic, you wouldn’t have been in a position to figure it out.

If you weren’t intensely interested in it for some reason, you wouldn’t have put yourself through all that.

LOL, I take it you never read my research on the obama birth announcements? Too bad I can’t actually write - I’d have a lot more readers. I do unbiased amateur research, and when I write about my findings I do it in a way that includes the process/journey. Most people can’t slog through it :).


238 posted on 10/07/2014 6:44:54 AM PDT by Ladysforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson