An account of possible jury misconduct surfaced Wednesday morning on Twitter, when several users sent messages about one juror who may have discussed evidence in the case with a friend.A third party CLAIMS that a juror discussed the case with them. The third party made the claims on twitter, the juror did not.In one of those messages, a person tweeted that they are friends with a member of the jury who doesn’t believe there is enough evidence to warrant an arrest of the officer, Darren Wilson.
Sabotage? A false claim? I wouldn't be surprised.
They are unhappy that this Grand Jury was picked prior to the shooting? This is my theory
As someone that feels that officer Darren is being railroaded, I counted this as the one good thing he had going for him, the fact that the Grand Jury was selected prior to the shooting.