[fhayek]

#1 microscopic 'friends' have been a known part of the equation for over a hundred years. Although it is always a concern, alas, the little head often does more thinking than the little head, and therefore is not necessarily a deal breaker.

#2 I used Tom Cruise. As a red-blooded, heterosexual American male, I may not be up on what is 'hot' now. Maybe I should have said Channing Tatum? Either way, I am sure that should Tom Cruise desire a woman, he would have little trouble procuring same.

#3 I do know men that are not exactly in Wilt Chamberlain class. Men that have not (probably) scored in decades. They don't exactly broadcast the fact. Looks are a part of it. Attitude. Economic circumstances certainly. And, oh yeah, hygiene. Now, one could work on some (or all) of these, and probably should. Or, on a lonlely Saturday night, he could plunk down a couple hundred bucks.

Now, I am not condoning any of this. But you said that men are the one's concerned with looks. Even with a great deal of effort, there is only so high some guys will be able to reach. $250 bucks overcomes that, even for only 40 minutes.

[Bigg Red]

I have no idea who Channing Tatum is. An actor, I suppose.

But, anyway, eww, still.

If these poor lonely guys you speak of would put a little effort into romancing a lady — a real lady and not some phony tramp — perhaps they would not be in such a predicament.

Seriously, before I met my wonderful husband, I met some of the Mr. Lonely types, so I know whereof I speak.