Murrieta Mutiny: Border Patrol “Will Not Obey Unlawful Orders” (shortened)

SHTF Plan ^ | 7/15/14 | Mac Slavo

[Kartographer]

Given the recent history of such brazen actions by American citizens exercising their First Amendment rights, it was believed that the federal government would step in and begin detaining protesters in free speech zones or temporary holding facilities so that the buses could get through.

But that never happened.

Now, a highly credible insider speaking with GMN in a recorded interview has shed some light on what happened, and according to him things could have gone a whole different direction.

According to the whistleblower, who has thus far remained anonymous for fear of reprisal, the Department of Homeland Security on orders from the White House was preparing to disperse the protesters with physical force if necessary. Federal riot police were being mobilized, complete with riot gear, body armor and armored personnel carriers.

When local law enforcement and border patrol agents, many of whom live in Murrieta, got wind of the plot they reportedly pushed back against the Federal government and themselves protested behind closed doors.

[bamahead]

...The Department of Homeland Security on orders from the White House was preparing to disperse the protesters with physical force if necessary...

“Most of the Border Patrol agents here at this facility are residents of Murrieta ... the agents declared that they would not obey any unlawful orders which violate the Constitutional rights of peaceful protestors.”



Libertarian ping! Click here to get added or here to be removed or post a message here!

[demshateGod]

Bundy Ranch changed everything.

[demshateGod]

Bundy Ranch changed everything.

[Amendment10]

"According to the whistleblower, who has thus far remained anonymous for fear of reprisal, the Department of Homeland Security on orders from the White House was preparing to disperse the protesters with physical force if necessary. Federal riot police were being mobilized, complete with riot gear, body armor and armored personnel carriers."

This is déjà vu concerning rumors years ago of corrupt fed government arguably trying to unconstitutionally expand its powers by getting citizens to fight back with respect to 4th Amendment concerns about TSA requiring everybody to get x-rayed before being permitted to board aircraft.

[bamahead]

You are more right than you probably wanted to be, FRiend....

Police Consolidation: The End of Local Law Enforcement.

Self-serving bureaucrats inside the U.S. government are tirelessly trying to obliterate local police forces answerable to local citizens and promote the consolidation movement as a step toward federalization of law enforcement. These proponents of regional and national police forces desire nothing less than the eradication of all local police departments and sheriffs’ offices, the surrender of state and municipal sovereignty, and the conversion of cops into federal security agents sworn not to protect and to serve their neighbors, but to protect the prerogatives of politicians.

Take for example the information contained in a White Paper presented earlier this year to the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. In that report, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is encouraged to embark on an “evolving mission” away from its ostensible purpose of fighting terrorism, toward becoming the administrators of an enormous domestic intelligence agency resulting from an integration of the country’s local and state law-enforcement agencies.

This report was written by the Aspen Institute Homeland Security Group, co-chaired by former DHS chief Michael Chertoff. The blueprint promoted in the White Paper pushes Congress toward green-lighting the growth of DHS and the dissolution of local police and sheriffs.

The organization described in the paper, entitled “Homeland Security and Intelligence: Next Steps in Evolving the Mission,” is reminiscent of more draconian governments. For example, one section of the report calls for a transition in the mission of DHS away from protecting the country from the “terrorism” of foreign militants and toward “more specific homeward focused areas.” Additional sections of the report lay out the plans for building a DHS/police hybrid agency that can monitor Americans in any town and prevent threats from fellow citizens.

In order to achieve their ultimate aim, the globalists demand that DHS or some other federal agency take control of the personnel decisions currently made by local police chiefs and county sheriffs. “As the threat grows more localized,” the report claims, “the federal government’s need to train, and even staff, local agencies, such as major city police departments, will grow.” Put another way: The federal government will run your local police department and sheriff’s office.

A key component of this proposal is the establishment of “fusion centers.” The following information is taken from a fact sheet on fusion centers posted on the DHS website: “A fusion center is a collaborative effort of two or more agencies that provide resources, expertise and information to the center with the goal of maximizing their ability to detect, prevent, investigate, and respond to criminal and terrorist activity.”

A description of the functioning of these incubators for the forthcoming federal police force is also provided on the DHS site:

State and major urban area fusion centers (fusion centers) serve as primary focal points within the state and local environment for the receipt, analysis, gathering, and sharing of threat-related information among federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial (SLTT) partners.... Fusion centers conduct analysis and facilitate information sharing, assisting law enforcement and homeland security partners in preventing, protecting against, and responding to crime and terrorism.

The literature promoting the acceptance of fusion centers lists several ways the new federal agency will impose its will on the formerly autonomous and accountable police chief or county sheriff.

[willywill]

I have to be honest, I don’t believe either story. I don’t believe the feds will use force, it would be a disaster of epic proportions, and I don’t believe local police would cross the feds.

[Kartographer]

As pointed out by another poster what happened at the Bundy Ranch?

[satan]

Why “Veggie?”

See my tag

[prisoner6]

Quote was just on Longmire. First time an anti fed gov group has been portrayed in a bad light.

On the show the leader of the group said the actual quote was “blood of tyrants and patriots.”

I must look that up later tonight.

[Gene Eric]

Or our best enemy...

But seriously, it’s the Leftist factions of govt that are problematic along with the pathetic representation of our Constitutional interests.

I’m still a fan of the Military, USPS, and the intelligence agencies.

Even during the primaries, we’re having a hard time getting the decent citizens through the system. The electorate is largely numb, comfortable, and irresponsible.

[steve86]

You don’t believe this particular report is credible?

I'm just commenting on previous SHTF stories -- tin-foil alarmist sensationalist tripe at its best.

This particular story might well be true -- who knows at this point.

[Verginius Rufus]

First time an anti fed gov group has been portrayed in a bad light.

It seems to me that the Confederates are sometimes portrayed in a bad light.

[skeeter]

Agree. I look at the military differently - outside of the politically minded individuals in the officer corps and in the Pentagon it is made up of civilians who've temporarily loaned themselves in service of the nation.

Opposed to governmental bureaucrats who are clearly interested primarily in their own aggrandizement.

[prisoner6]

Usually it’s enviro wackos, hippies, left activists and even illegal aliens and American Indians. The overall storyline seems to really portray American Indians in a very bad light.

For an A&E show it has been amazing! Every few episodes there is one that is too intense for me but it is very well done.

[B4Ranch]

>>I don’t believe local police would cross the feds.<<

You’re saying that you would allow strangers to your neighborhood to tell you what to do?

No, you wouldn’t but the local cops would?

Think about what you’re saying. It’s not logical.

[Gene Eric]

Exactly — tyranny through bureaucracy.

[boycott]

hussen obamar needs to get a clue and realize that a lot of people in uniform don’t have his back (as goofyazz likes to say). These folks are Americans. They put Americans before obama’s anti-American agenda.

[immadashell]

Oathkeepers.org

Oath Keepers - Guardians of the Republic.

[GOPJ]

“Our contact inside the U.S. Border Patrol told us that we do not even realize how impactful the protest was….it was a shot heard around the world….all the way back to Guatemala; Mexico, and not just the U.S. Government….the influx of immigrants coming over the border has decreased from 1500 per day down to 800 per day…cut almost in half as a direct result of what we’ve done.”

The front line U.S. Border Patrol agents are essentially refusing to perform any unconstitutional act upon the protesters, and they let their intentions be known to their superiors. As a result, the Department of Homeland Security could not proceed with delivery of another busload of illegal immigrants to Murrieta....

pinh

[Utilizer]

The Postal Service? Really?

You must not know the same types of Postal Service employees I have had to deal with -for over a decade at least!