Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: BroJoeK; RFEngineer

“RFEngineer: “In Lee’s time, loyalty to ones state was not unusual. “

You: “Again, it’s you are utterly confused & disoriented.
You look facts straight in the face, and still deny them, because they don’t fit what you believe. The fact is that many Virginians considered the nation a higher value than their slave-owning state’s secession.”

Perhaps ‘many’ did but many more did not.

The federal government well after the Civil War understood and respected states and their right to be sovereign and this was reflected in the People and their loyalties. . .hence the ‘states rights’ argument as justification for the war.

Post 70 is from the 22 Jan 1897, Congressional Directory, 2nd Session, 54th Congress (the oldest directory I have in hand).

This directory states clearly and in plain language that the president would not directly communicate with state’s governors but instead would use the Sec State. . .just like he would when communicating with foreign governments.

Even after the Civil War the state and People were respected by the federal government, as the federal government kept its distance from them.

The federal government played a very central role to the states and how they related to each other (no doubt), but the federal government recognized its limits and respected the people as citizens of the US, but also sovereign citizens of their state.

Ergo, state loyalty was strong, much stronger that we can appreciate today when most people can’t explain why we have state governments in the first place and always default to the federal government to solve issues and problems.

States as sovereign affects greatly the question of loyalty to the federal government over your own state.

Some chose their state over the federal government, some did not. Regardless, it was NOT an easy decision at the time.

Men respected each other for their decision they made, federal vs state, and identified with them for having to make such a difficult (and deadly) choice.


137 posted on 06/25/2014 3:20:21 PM PDT by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]


To: Hulka
I don't think I've seen anything you posted that I necessarily disagree with.
Indeed, it may be that you support my basic idea that our Republic was not fundamentally changed by Civil War itself, but that the explosion in Federal power began 100 years ago with the 16th & 17th Amendments.

Your quotes show that even as late as circa 1890, the old relationships still were recognized.

Of course the 13th, 14th & 15th amendments did change everything, but the federal government did not begin its explosion from 2% of GDP to now over 20% until the 16th gave it unlimited revenues and the 17th freed it from states’ control over the US Senate.

138 posted on 06/26/2014 6:14:08 AM PDT by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson