Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Mamzelle
Maybe SC would still have a Lindsey Graham for senator. I doubt it, but let's say you are right.

Now that Lindsey works for a couple hundred legislators who keep very close track of his votes, what is the chance Graham will vote in any way against the interests of SC, and more importantly, against the interest of keeping his job?

Would Graham even consider consenting to sitting judges hostile to the 10th Amendment?

By the design of the Framers, it was expected that less than virtuous men would look out for their interests. By doing so, they would keep the new federal government in its constitutional box.

34 posted on 06/14/2014 1:26:59 AM PDT by Jacquerie (To restore the 10th Amendment, repeal the 17th. Article V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Jacquerie

If the SC GOP can’t do the job, neither could the legislature.


35 posted on 06/14/2014 4:53:36 PM PDT by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson