So you don’t see any problems, but your answers to all the questions I asked is “I don’t know”? Is that about right?
You don’t see a person in black pants underwater, wearing white goggles and a yellow scuba mask? That isn’t clear enough for you to see that?
I didn't see any white goggles or a yellow scuba mask. I see blurry pictures, motion frozen with lighting distorted by water.
Have you ever swum in the ocean?
In all fairness, I didn't see any of that either. If you can't show convincing images, it's hard to convince anybody. I think you might have been better off without any of the stills from the video. All I could see was her black slacks and the sole of her shoe. That doesn't mean there might not have been foul play. It just means your images weren't clear enough to convince.
Something might have been 'arranged' just not the way you see it. Imo if there was foul play, each and every person on that aircraft was a potential tragedy. The people who have so much at stake, wouldn't just single out their victim, swatting nine flies to silence one, would be more their MO.
The fact/story that the engine was lifted out of the water a week before the aircraft was salvaged, (is that true?) smells somewhat. I don't think there's anything to be gained by discussing it further on FR. You appear to be, like myself, enjoying very limited support here.