We're from the Government and here to help:
The EPA conducted five experiments in 2010 and 2011 to look at the health effects of particulate matter, or PM, and diesel exhaust on humans. The IGs report found that the EPA did get consent forms from 81 people in five studies. But the IG also found that exposure risks were not always consistently represented.
To: TexasCajun
Three of the studies exposed people to high levels of PM and two of the studies exposed people to high levels of diesel exhaust and ozone. Diesel exhaust contains 40 toxic air contaminants, including 19 that are known carcinogens and PM. The EPA has publicly warned of the dangers of PM, but seemed to downplay them in their scientific studies on humans.
To: TexasCajun
Remove them then sue them.
3 posted on
04/02/2014 2:41:56 PM PDT by
A CA Guy
( God Bless America, God Bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
To: TexasCajun
Must be descendants of all those Operation Paperclip Nazis inhabiting the EPA.
4 posted on
04/02/2014 2:43:16 PM PDT by
dljordan
(WhoVoltaire: "To find out who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.")
To: TexasCajun
Anyone EPA employee who participated in this poisoning of Americans needs to be charged with attempted murder.
6 posted on
04/02/2014 2:59:39 PM PDT by
BuffaloJack
(Freedom isn't free; nor is it easy. END ALL TOTALITARIAN ACTIVITY NOW.)
To: TexasCajun
These people are no different than nazis! Human life means nothing to them! How can people vote for people who think like this? Evil, pure evil.
7 posted on
04/02/2014 3:00:05 PM PDT by
Linda Frances
(Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness.)
To: TexasCajun
I didn't see an explanation of how the tests were administered. No mention of contrails. What the article does establish is that the EPA has no reservation about deliberately administering known toxins to American with little or no warning.
To: TexasCajun
As long as they are using Progressives as lab rats, what’s the big deal?
10 posted on
04/02/2014 3:05:19 PM PDT by
jonascord
(Laeti vescimur nos subacturis)
To: TexasCajun
Old , old news if you read JUNKSCIENCE with Steve Milloy.
Steve proven correct again!
12 posted on
04/02/2014 3:12:48 PM PDT by
Cyman
(We have to pass it to see what's in it= definition of stool sample)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson