Actually, it started out as "will be made public in March." Mike Shoesmith of PPSimmons (the author of the article starting this thread) wrote in January:
"Today, Gallups revealed that the long-awaited details of this investigation will be made public in March of this year, a mere two months from now".
Surely the viability of the key elements in the MCSO CCP case are not still dependent on whether this week’s round of new threads can be neatly tied up? Surely the main dish is sufficiently vetted to pack a wallop regardless of which salad and sides accompany it?
An apt analogy.
An even more skeptical (and I believe correct) view is that since the 2012 elections there has been virtually no "MCSO" involvement in this and it's been purely the "Zullo-Gallups Fantasy Show." Sheriff Arpaio has scarcely said a word since 2012, other than to repeat that there's no where for him to take the "evidence." (The MC D.A. politely showed him the door, and Arpaio knows Congress isn't going to act).
Arpaio got into this at the behest of some of his more conservative constituents. In early 2012, Arpaio likely correctly perceived that going through the B.C. pressers would shore up his vote numbers (which had declined in each of his prior elections) and get him some national press (read: money). And I think he made the calculus in early 2012 that Obama would NOT be re-elected, so this whole issue would die out after November.
But then Obama was re-elected. I think Arpaio determined that he'd get more immediate negative pushback were he to disband Zullo's CCP, and it's easier to let the Zullo go off half-cocked because there are relatively very few paying any attention to Carl Gallup's puny NW Florida AM station show. Two arguable "insiders" lend credence to this view. First, former CCP insider Brian Reilly has now stated the CCP investigation was intended to last only through the 2012 election. And when Zullo claimed on the Gallups show that there were two full-time MCSO investigators working on the CCP investigation, a blogger contacted the MCSO and received back reply that Zullo's claim was B.S.
I think Zullo's off in Bernie Maddoff-like territory: in so deep into this (for ego or whatever reason) that he's continually having to spin more and more "great event" teasers to keep his house of cards propped up. Gallups likes the ratings boost he seems to get whenever he reports giddily on whatever schlock Zullo is ladling out that week. But Gallups is too clueless about what a real investigation should look like to ask the hard questions.
But it's been all puff and no delivery for 15 months at least now. And Sheriff Joe appears to be keeping a safe distance, just in case he needs to pull the plug.
Yes, I have essentially run out of patience with Arpaio and Zullo and Gallups and Gillar. Moreover, I teeter on the edge of losing ALL hope that ANY substantial new evidence will emerge about Obama’s identity-related deception before 2017.
However, as that malaise begins to set in with me, it has not yet been enough to dissuade me from my conclusion that Team Obama has perpetrated despicable crimes of fraud against the American people with appalling success. Particularly, I cannot come up with any lens through which to view the Hawaii Department of Health that would cast an innocent light upon their actions with respect to Obama’s birth certificate.
In short, if all the HDOH ever had about the birth and life of Barack Obama amounted to exactly everything he ever wanted us to know they had, no more no less, then I am quite convinced that Campaign Headquarters and the Hawaiian government could have come up with a much more satisfying way to convincingly disclose everything much, much sooner and more transparently than they did.
In my mind, even if Savannah Guthrie saw and touched a raised seal on a document that looks just like the pdf released by the White House, and even if the innocent combination of Mac Preview and a Xerox WorkCentre scan is alone sufficient to explain every alleged anomaly in the layered digital file, I think we are still left utterly without a means to explain the years of delaying, dodging, posturing, self-contradiction, rules changing, blame shifting and obfuscating that continually hang as a dark cloud over every step Hawaiian officials have taken regarding their presumed documentation of Mr. Obama.
So for now, I’m content to harbor a yet glimmer of hope in my mind that one day someone, somewhere will somehow nestle his pry bar into just the right crevice that will yield leverage enough to bring the stone wall crashing down. But, I can be honest enough to admit that most conspiracy theorists never get to see any walls crumble, and if my proverbial wall persists long enough on this issue, I will eventually face conceding that the wall was never more than a mere figment of my imprudent conjecture.