Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Video - Yee in 2012: 'Extremely important that individuals in CA do not own assault weapons'
You Tube/CBSSF.com/Conserative Intel ^ | 3/27/14 | cbssf.com/Sen Leland Yee, (D) CA

Posted on 03/27/2014 12:52:24 PM PDT by The Old Hoosier

Edited on 03/27/2014 6:09:24 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

Here’s some 2012 footage of Leland Yee, D, the California state Senator arrested and accused yesterday of trying to help smuggle rocket launchers and automatic weapons:

While discussing plans to smuggle arms from the Philippines, Yee allegedly said to the undercover FBI agent: "People want to get whatever they want to get. Do I care? No, I don’t care. People need certain things.”

Direct link to You Tube. Title: California State Senator Leland Yee trying to ban more guns...

You Tube source hogfeederyahoo



TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: banglist; blogpimp; california; democrat; fbi; lelandyee; sumtingwong; yee
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
Mega-hypocrisy alert.
1 posted on 03/27/2014 12:52:24 PM PDT by The Old Hoosier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: The Old Hoosier

Nah, he just left out the part of just so long as he gets his payoff.


2 posted on 03/27/2014 12:56:07 PM PDT by Mastador1 (I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Old Hoosier

First, this is not an excerpt. There is no addtional text at the link (that I can find.)

Second the video is a readily available YouTube link -

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=zjS6cruqrx8

Third there is an annoying pop-up that blocks the initial view of the site.


3 posted on 03/27/2014 12:58:25 PM PDT by shibumi (Cover it with gas and set it on fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mastador1

There’s actually a lot of Yee video out there. I usually assume that Dems who push for gun control are illogical and well-meaning, but this guy is just a stone-cold hypocrite. Here he is complaining about bullet buttons, and at the same time helping someone he thinks is involved with the mafia import ROCKET LAUNCHERS.


4 posted on 03/27/2014 12:58:31 PM PDT by The Old Hoosier (Right makes might)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: The Old Hoosier

As I have said too many times, liberals deliberately leave guns in the hands of violent criminals while striving to take them away from honest, law-abiding non-violent individuals.


5 posted on 03/27/2014 12:58:59 PM PDT by I want the USA back (Media: completely irresponsible traitors. Complicit in the destruction of our country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shibumi

It’s not an excerpt, no, but the link is there for your convenience so you can see the video.


6 posted on 03/27/2014 12:59:07 PM PDT by The Old Hoosier (Right makes might)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: The Old Hoosier

I bet if enough people had ponied up under the table he would have totally changed his tune on guns.


7 posted on 03/27/2014 1:00:25 PM PDT by Mastador1 (I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: The Old Hoosier

Link the video here.

FR does not exist to drive traffic to your blog.


8 posted on 03/27/2014 1:02:17 PM PDT by shibumi (Cover it with gas and set it on fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: The Old Hoosier

At one point there were probably in excess of 60,000 nuclear weapons worldwide. (We had 31,000 in the late ‘60’s.) Now, I’m certain that the ones the US had were dismantled. But, according to General Lebed, the man in charge of the Soviet nuclear production, the Soviets weren’t even certain how many they made. They weren’t serialized and different methods were used and the figures were lost. So, what happened to all those Soviet nukes? In short, they’re not sure. Lebed said he made 100 suitcase nukes for the KGB. When the Soviet Union fell he went to get them back and was told, “What nukes?”

So, for certain there are 100 small ones lose out there someplace. It only takes one guy with this man’s attitude to incinerate hundreds of thousands.

With Iran coming onboard, it will, at some point happen. Can you imagine that over the next 100 years it won’t? Fifty years? Ten years? 2016?


9 posted on 03/27/2014 1:06:01 PM PDT by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Old Hoosier

Weapons are only for governments and the criminal gangs that are controlled by the government...


10 posted on 03/27/2014 1:10:40 PM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I want the USA back
... liberals deliberately leave guns in the hands of violent criminals while striving to take them away from honest, law-abiding non-violent individuals.

That truth cannot be told too often, so have at it.

11 posted on 03/27/2014 1:21:35 PM PDT by Navy Patriot (Join the Democrats, it's not Fascism when WE do it, and the Constitution and law mean what WE say.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: shibumi
FR does not exist to drive traffic to your blog.

Every single news source listed on Free Republic can say the same thing about Free Republic.


12 posted on 03/27/2014 1:22:41 PM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: The Old Hoosier

Treasonous bag of sh** be he...


13 posted on 03/27/2014 1:28:27 PM PDT by Axenolith (Government blows, and that which governs least, blows least...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gen.Blather
With Iran coming onboard, it will, at some point happen. Can you imagine that over the next 100 years it won’t? Fifty years? Ten years? 2016?

Actually there is some good news there. Nukes are more fragile than people realize, and especially don't do well over time. They have a number of componants that need to be fressh, and degrade fast. Nuke stockpiling is a difficult business even in the US. So just keeping a stolen nuke around for decades pretty much guarantees it's not going to be ready for prime time. Even the high explosive triggers might not work. I would guess that for this reason, if the stolen nukes weren't going to be used anytime soon, the plutonium was removed for sale on the global market, to be used in fresh nukes sometime in the future - as well as the high explosives, to be used elsewhere as well. But the original mechanisms would be tossed.

14 posted on 03/27/2014 1:29:24 PM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Talisker; The Old Hoosier

This blogger has done nothing but purloin a video, post it to a blog and then repost it here in order to drive traffic trough his hit counter.

He is also posting in direct contravention to the wishes of the site owner, as expressed here:

http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3109294/posts?page=64#64

It’s pimping - plain and simple.


15 posted on 03/27/2014 1:30:54 PM PDT by shibumi (Cover it with gas and set it on fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

To: Talisker

There was a Simpsons episode where the evil character had stolen a nuclear weapon. At the moment of detonation they did that freeze frame on several of the characters, just as one of the famous apocalyptic movies had so successfully done. Then they focused in on the blast and it fizzled. Lisa bends over and reads the tag which says, “Best by November 1959.”

I do understand there are some deteriorating elements, which was why nuclear testing was so important. But I’d wager we’d get some hideously dirty explosions even if they don’t work correctly. Let’s say it’s only .5 megatons instead of 5. Still pretty messy.


17 posted on 03/27/2014 1:49:21 PM PDT by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: The Old Hoosier
Senator Leland Yee:
18 posted on 03/27/2014 1:52:22 PM PDT by Beowulf9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shibumi

You got a badge? Or do you do this because you think you’re being helpful? Because I liked his post. It drew my attention to the subject, and you were the one who disrupted the thread. Get a life.


19 posted on 03/27/2014 1:53:29 PM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: shibumi

Just for that,

I’M CLICKING ON HIS LINK!


20 posted on 03/27/2014 1:54:40 PM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson