Did you break into Daddy's liquor cabinet this weekend?
Your first two rambling, bloviating, paragraphs say nothing more than what I've said in exactly four words: "Incorporation is a fact."
Nevertheless, not all of the Bill of Rights is Incorporated, and the conservative majority was not forced to Incorporate Amendment II by any precedents that existed when they came to the court, respectively; and indeed the opinion in DC v. Heller made it clear that the majority considered the question of Incorporation as an entirely separate matter. The Seventh Circuit agreed: In McDonald v. Chicago, they found no such precedent for Incorporation in the Federal case law. In finding Amendment II Incorporated on reversal, the USSC majority applied THEIR OWN criteria -- and surprisingly, Scalia found his justification in Privileges and Immunities. But in NO CASE was the Court obligated by any precedent to do so, and the various concurring justifications make that clear.
So let's sum up for the drunken kindergartner who thinks he's lecturing a monkey: your logic about why conservatives don't agree with you is incorrect, and your understanding of the history of stare decisis regarding Incorporation is laughably wrong.
Keep drinking. Daddy will be home soon to lock up his whiskey.
Yawn. The pig likes it.